Showing posts with label anti immigrant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti immigrant. Show all posts

Sunday, August 15, 2021

Oppose the Republican Recall



 Oppose the California Recall 

The  California recall vote scheduled for Sept 14, is powered by a partisan, Republican coalition of national Republicans, anti-vaxxers, QAnon conspiracy theorists, anti-immigrant activists and Trump supporters. They seek to overturn the California governor’s election and their victory could threaten California’s economic recovery and Covid  control efforts.

From the Los Angeles Times: 

“Allied with radical and extreme elements… includ[ing] groups promoting distrust of government, science and medicine; peddlers of QAnon doomsday conspiracies; “patriots” readying for battle and one organization allied with the far-right extremist group, the Proud Boys.”

POLITICO reported how one of the co-founders and chief organizers of the recall- a former Yolo county deputy sheriff,  suggested it would be a good idea to “microchip” immigrants, and anti-immigrant rhetoric has been central to recall organizers’ appeals to supporters.

In addition to the anti Vaxxer extremism, the recall advocates reveal their anti immigrant  emphasis in the  published  official statement of reasons for the recall.  In the second sentence they say, 

“ Governor Newsom has implemented laws which are detrimental to the citizens of this state and our way of life. Laws he endorsed favor foreign nationals in our country illegally, over that of our own citizens….

And,  in the fourth sentence  they say, “ He has imposed sanctuary state status and fails to enforce immigration laws.”

That is how they argue in public for the record.  On social media they are much more blatant and aggressive. Could they be more clear? These are anti immigrant dog whistles.  And dog whistles work with some voters. 

This campaign is a  dangerous repeat  of the 1994 campaign of California  Prop.187 which initiated over 10 years of anti immigrant repression in the nation.   California  Proposition 187 was a hate crime.  It was a racists law, passed by 2/3 of California voters.  It banned over 600,000 immigrants from receiving needed food stamps, medical care.   Although overturned by a court decision at the state level in 1999, the elements of California  Prop. 187 became national law in 1996 as a part of the Immigration Reform and Control act of 1996 and the bipartisan  " Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-193)."  during the Clinton Administration. 

 These laws and policies are included in some of the most punitive and cruel  aspects of our current immigration enforcement system. How did this happen ?  In the Summer of 1993, a failing economy and governmental retrenchment combined to make Republican Governor Pete Wilson the most unpopular governor in recent history.  By November of 1994 Wilson won re-election with over 56% of the vote.  Two factors combined to deliver victory to Wilson; a mean spirited, divisive, and racist campaign directed against Mexican and Mexican Americans, and an inept campaign by Democratic Candidate Kathleen Brown. 

            The voters of California voted 62% to 38% in favor of Proposition 187, the  so called Save Our State initiative to restrict illegal immigration.  A number of groups including FAIR, the Republican Party,  Zero Population Growth and the Perot organization worked together to qualify the initiative. 

            In 1994 California had a population that is 56.3 % White, 26.3 % Latino, 9.4% Asian, 7.4 % African American, and 0.6% other.  However, according to exit polls, the voters in this election were 80% white, 9% Latino, 7 % African American, and 4 % Asian. Exit polls show that Latinos voted against Prop. 187 by 3 to 1, African Americans split their vote 50 -50, and the Anglo electorate, then the majority, passed the proposition by over 60%.

             

            On campuses the Chicano/Latino youth mobilized in unprecedented numbers. School walk outs and protests occurred up and down the state – but campus politics could not match the power of enraged, organized, angry voters.   

            

Make no mistake about it. This was an anti Mexican campaign.  While the Wilson said that he welcomed legal immigrants, the photos, the ads, the letters, the references, and the scapegoating clearly blamed Mexicans for the state’s economic crisis. 

The anti Mexican immigrant campaign of 1994  had far reaching  consequences.  For example, Proposition 186 on the same ballot would have provided a single payer health system for California, but it was defeated by the engaged voters.  In following years similar White voter majorities passed Proposition 209 banning Affirmative Action in California, and Proposition 227 banning bilingual education programs among others.

 

            Since Trump, blame the immigrant politics is on the Republican voter mobilization agenda once again. They are using the Covid economic crisis and blaming the current California governor for an endless series of problems related to the pandemic – and they are engaging and motivating the dangerous, armed white militarized organizations.  This agitation grows the white supremacy movement in the state and advances Republican politics- the same people who sought to overthrow the U.S. government on Jan.6, 2020. 

 

    California politics changed in the decade after the 1994  passing of Proposition 187. The Latino vote grew from about 20% of the electorate to 30 %.  A new younger generation of Latinos have now become active and elected leaders.  The growth of the Latino vote produced a major shift as California “Turned Blue,”  https://newlaborforum.cuny.edu/2020/01/03/the-blue-ing-of-california/ .  However the harmful national legislation that derived from the Proposition 187 campaign was never repealed.  It remains law. 

 

  And, bad race baiting politics did not go away.  In a substantive July 27, 2021, poll, some 47% of likely California voters would vote to recall Newsom, while some 50% oppose the recall.  And, the Republican right is much more engaged  and enthused in the campaign than are the Democrats.  A September election will be a low turnout election, which usually means an increased percentage of White voters. To date, the anti recall campaign has been unimaginative.

 

The recall campaign could be a decisive turning point similar to the attacks on union workers by then Governor Walker of 2010-2012 in Wisconsin.  With a mobilized  anti immigrant  anti Mexican campaign  a majority of California voters  could turn Republican once again. To avoid this calamity, every union, every progressive organization, every prodemocracy group, and certainly each of the many Latino political organizations should have their members walking precincts, working phone banks, and talking to their neighbors to make certain that a sufficient number of Democrats and independents understand the danger of this recall campaign. 

 

 

It is in each of our interests to unite to defeat this recall.

 

Dr. Duane E. Campbell,

Professor Emeritus. California State U- Sacramento

Co- Chair. Immigrants Rights Working Group,

Democratic Socialists of America

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, August 19, 2020

Trump Escalates Anti Immigrant Assault in Yuma


By Michael D. Shear

·       Aug. 19, 2020, 9:00 a.m. ET

YUMA, Ariz. — President Trump on Tuesday accused Joseph R. Biden Jr. of seeking to throw open the United States’ borders to criminals and disease, using the backdrop of a border city to stoke fears of immigrants as Democrats prepared for the second day of the party’s nominating convention.

Speaking at an airport hangar, Mr. Trump boasted about his own efforts to sharply limit immigration during his time in office, claiming to have made the country safer by blocking asylum seekers, refugees and other immigrants seeking to live and work in the United States.

The president reprised the darkest language of his 2016 campaign, warning that should Mr. Biden win the presidency, the Trump-era restrictions on foreigners would be abandoned in favor of policies that he said would allow “aliens with criminal records” to roam free across the country, threatening violence and stealing jobs from Americans.

“We’re talking about abolishing ICE. We’re talking about abolishing prisons,” Mr. Trump said to an enthusiastic but small crowd, referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “Biden’s campaign has turned into a cult for open border and other zealots.”

Mr. Trump’s anti-immigrant stance helped him win the election in 2016 and has been at the core of his presidency. He has denied entry to foreigners seeking protection from persecution, tried to end a program shielding from deportation young people brought to the United States illegally as children and cut back on legal immigration programs.

IMMIGRATION POLITICS

While courts have blocked some of his most extreme efforts, Mr. Trump and his top aides have succeeded in making it harder for immigrants to enter the country.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/18/us/politics/trump-immigration-arizona.html?

  

Wednesday, August 05, 2020

The Need to Defeat Trump

¡Hay que derrotar a Trump, desacreditar su movimiento y elegir a candidatos progresistas ¡
Los que firmamos esta declaración somos socialistas democráticos que queremos insistir en que la prioridad para la izquierda en el 2020 debe ser la derrota electoral de Donald Trump y su Partido Republicano. Hoy por hoy, la única forma de lograrlo es votando por su contrincante Demócrata en noviembre.
El autoritarismo racista, xenófobo y misógino del trompismo representa un peligro inmediato, uno de vida o muerte para las personas de color, para los inmigrantes, para los derechos reproductivos, para los sindicatos, para las personas LGBTQIA, para los musulmanes, judíos y miembros de otras religiones, así como para la democracia en sí. La victoria de Trump fortalecería un estado autoritario, aumentaría las agresiones imperiales y cerraría el espacio político para la izquierda y demás fuerzas democráticas en los Estados Unidos. La tarea política más urgente que enfrentamos es revertir este creciente neofascismo: es un imperativo estratégico para nuestro país.
Al usar el hambre para obligar a la gente a trabajar, el régimen de Trump les impone miles de muertos a las comunidades negra, latina, inmigrante asi como a las mujeres. Insiste en la reapertura económica pese a una pandemia descontrolada. El régimen tolera asesinatos como los de George Floyd, Breonna Taylor y Ahmaud Arbery; cierra las clínicas de aborto; y aplica lo que puede ser una pena de muerte a los encarcelados, incluyendo los detenidos por ICE. Los ataques de turbas alentadas por el presidente contra gobiernos estatales en manos del Partido Demócrata recuerdan cómo los terroristas partidarios del Sur revirtieron la Reconstrucción después de la Guerra Civil.
Miles mueren por el coronavirus todas las semanas, de manera desproporcionada personas de color, y sobre todo las personas de tercera edad que habitan las residencias de ancianos, los encarcelados y los inmigrantes detenidos. ¿Cuántos más hay que sacrificar?
Creemos que la mejor manera de derrotar al trompismo, así como al propio Trump, es con una plataforma que rompa decisivamente con las políticas neoliberales, especialmente la austeridad, la privatización, la desregulación y los acuerdos comerciales antiobreros. Pero a corto plazo, como cuestión práctica, también hay que forjar alianzas con otras fuerzas que se oponen a Trump, en aras de una victoria Demócrata en noviembre.
Debemos continuar promoviendo los intereses del pueblo trabajador por encima de los del 1%, enfrentando el racismo y el sexismo institucional en la aplicación de la ley, en el empleo y en los servicios sociales, abordando el catastrófico cambio climático y promoviendo la salud pública. Pero ese enfoque central no tiene por qué impedirnos promover el voto en contra de Trump. Tampoco debe disuadirnos de respaldar con entusiasmo a cargos públicos y candidatos progresistas como las cuatro congresistas conocidas como “the squad” en la Cámara de Representantes.
De especial importancia es apoyar vigorosamente a los socialistas democráticos declarados, como el senador Bernie Sanders y las representantes Alexandria Ocasio Cortez y Rashida Tlaib. Hay que defenderlos en contra de las campañas que buscan desprestigiarlos y derrotarlos, sobre todo para que más gente progresista logre cargos públicos.
Nuestro trabajo electoral tendrá mayor impacto si se realiza de manera cooperativa con todos los sectores progresistas, como sindicatos, grupos comunitarios y de derechos civiles así como organizaciones políticas progresistas. Este enfoque colaborativo impulsó la campaña presidencial de Bernie Sanders y ayudó a la elección de Ocasio-Cortez y Tlaib, entre otros.
El compromiso de Trump con la destrucción de las instituciones democráticas básicas (el derecho al voto, un poder judicial independiente, una prensa libre, el Congreso como un poder del estado de igual rango al ejecutivo, el carácter soberano de los gobiernos estatales) bloquearía cualquier agenda progresista. No hay nada más importante que garantizar que sea echado de la Casa Blanca.
Statement in  the Nation- with signatures.



Thursday, April 09, 2020

Trump continues anti immigrant campaigns

Even as he fails management of the Covid 19 crisis, Trump continues his anti immigrant politics. He hopes we are not watching.

U.S. deports 400 migrant children under new coronavirus rules

WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. immigration officials have rapidly deported nearly 400 migrant children intercepted at the U.S.-Mexico border in the past two weeks under new rules billed as seeking to limit the spread of the novel coronavirus in the United States, according to government data seen by Reuters. 
President Donald Trump’s administration implemented new border rules on March 21 that scrapped decades-long practices under laws meant to protect children from human trafficking and offer them a chance to seek asylum in a U.S. immigration court. Under the new rules, U.S. officials can quickly remove people without standard immigration proceedings. 
Overall, U.S. border officials have expelled nearly 7,000 migrants to Mexico since the new procedures took effect, according to the data and a Mexican government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. Of those, 377 were minors, the data showed. 
The overall number of 7,000 was first published by ProPublica, but the figure for children deported has not previously been reported. 
Around 120 of the minors, who arrived at the U.S.-Mexico border without a parent or legal guardian, were quickly sent on planes back to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, according to data from March 27 to April 2. It was not clear whether the remainder of the children intercepted at the border were pushed back to Mexico or returned to their home countries during the preceding week. 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) declined to comment. The agency in the past has said that all people caught crossing illegally, including minors, could be subjected to the new restrictions, which aim to cut the time migrants arrested at the border are held in U.S. custody. 
Read full article

 April 3, 2020  2:11 pm  By Halina Schiffman-Shilo  CityLimits
 The $2 trillion stimulus bill that was just passed was supposed to protect public health and the economy from financial ruin. Yet, it penalizes everyday Americans who dare to marry the person they love, and is a dangerous continuation of this administration’s assault on undocumented immigrants and their families.
 Under the stimulus bill, mixed-immigration status families, known as “mixed-status families,” are not eligible to receive the stimulus rebate if a U.S. citizen files his or her taxes jointly with an undocumented family member. The stimulus bill already excludes undocumented immigrants, even those who pay taxes with an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number, or ITIN, from cash assistance, food stamps, and unemployment benefits.
 However, purposefully excluding mixed-status families from the stimulus rebate is particularly cruel, given that undocumented immigrants, and their families (including U.S. citizens), are the most vulnerable population in times of crisis, as they have no access to the “safety net” available to many Americans.
 This is how the stimulus bill will play out in real life. As an immigration attorney with the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG), I work with Juan and his wife Julia, who are a mixed-status family (their names have been changed to protect their identity). Juan is an undocumented immigrant. He has lived in the United States for almost 20 years. He pays his taxes through his ITIN, and sends money to his home country every month to support his family. He met his wife Julia—a U.S. citizen—more than a decade ago. Julia and Juan have two U.S. citizen children. Julia survived a life-threatening illness as a teen and still suffers from chronic pain as a result.
Before the pandemic, Juan and Julia worked full time. When Julia’s pain was too severe, she had to stay home from work, leaving Juan to work full time and care for Julia and the children. While Juan and Julia’s lives are not easy, they have each other, and have given their children a loving and safe home. Like many other families around America, Covid-19 (or the coronavirus) has placed them in a precarious financial situation.
 Unlike many other families around America, however, and although both Juan and Julia pay taxes, only Julia will receive a stimulus rebate. By leaving immigrants like Juan out of the stimulus bill, his family will lose out on $1,200, which could mean the difference between paying rent, and facing homelessness.
Juan and Julia are still a “lucky” mixed-status family. Because they file their taxes separately, Julia is still entitled to her stimulus rebate. Mixed-status couples that file their taxes jointly will receive nothing under the stimulus bill.
 There is an additional twist for mixed-status couples filing a marriage-based petition so the undocumented spouse can become a lawful permanent resident (a green-card holder). As part of the immigration process, mixed-status couples have to prove to immigration that they did not marry for immigration benefits. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the branch of the Department of Homeland Security that adjudicates family-based immigration petitions, reviews a petitioning couple’s application to see if their lives are intertwined. Typically, joint tax returns help demonstrate that the petitioning couple has a real marriage.
 This stimulus bill unjustly and unfairly deprives mixed status-couples of the stimulus rebate for filing joint tax returns, the same joint tax returns that USCIS views as indicia of a real marriage. In fact, couples in this situation are doubly penalized. Not only are they precluded from receiving a stimulus rebate, but USCIS is currently closed, meaning mixed-status couples who have a marriage-based petition pending with USCIS are stuck in administrative limbo, as the undocumented spouse cannot complete the process to become a lawful permanent resident.



Thursday, June 14, 2018

House Republicans Advance Monster Bill

JohnMoore/GettyImages

Republicans seek to protect their vulnerable candidates, not to protect people.
Funds border wall. 
Restricts asylum rules.
Legalizes separation of children and families. 
Offers limited protection for current DACA recipients. 
Reduces over all immigration. 
Unclear what it would do on TPS. 

This is Fascism
U.S. Catholic Bishops say current policy of separating families is immoral.  
Getty Images

A survivor of the NAZI Death Camps remembers life in Germany this way;

Pastor Martin Niemöller is best remembered for the quotation: 
First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me. 1947.

We still talk about American fascism as a looming threat, something that could happen if we’re not vigilant. But for undocumented immigrants, it’s already here.
There are countless horror stories about what’s happening to immigrants under Trump. Just last week, we learned that a teenager from Iowa who had lived in America since he was 3 was killed shortly after his forced return to Mexico. This month, an Ecuadorean immigrant with an American citizen wife and a pending green card application was detained at a Brooklyn military base where he’d gone to deliver a pizza; a judge has temporarily halted his deportation, but he remains locked up. Immigration officers are boarding trains and buses and demanding that passengers show them their papers. On Monday, Attorney General Jeff Sessions decreed that most people fleeing domestic abuse or gang violence would no longer be eligible for asylum.


Thursday, June 29, 2017

Republican- Trump Immigration Bills Begin to Move Through House

H.R. 3003 – No Sanctuary for Criminals Act  STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY   H.R. 3003 – No Sanctuary for Criminals Act
Rep. Goodlatte, R-VA, and nine cosponsors)
The Administration strongly supports House passage of H.R. 3003, the No Sanctuary for Criminals Act. This bill would ensure that American taxpayers are not subsidizing States and localities that work to affirmatively thwart Federal law enforcement efforts.
For States or localities determined to be in violation of Federal law, H.R. 3003 would restrict their eligibility to receive certain Department of Justice or Department of Homeland Security grants. Instead, under this bill, those grant funds would be reallocated to States and localities that comply with Federal law. Additionally, this bill would provide for more robust detention of criminal aliens. The Administration is committed to strengthening enforcement of our Nation’s immigration laws in order to improve national security and public safety. This legislation is critical to these efforts.
If H.R. 3003 were presented to the President in its current form, his advisors would recommend that he sign the bill into law.


TRUMP'S IMMIGRATION SELL: The House is expected to take up two immigration bills today, one that would crack down on so-called sanctuary cities and another that would increase penalties for people who reenter the U.S. multiple times after a deportation. 
President Donald Trump threw his support behind both bills this week. On Wednesday, Trump met at the White House with victims of crimes allegedly committed by undocumented immigrants and lauded the Republican lawmakers who crafted the legislation, including House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.). The White House later issued a press release that tallied Trump's accomplishments in the enforcement area, from increased arrests to (yet unfulfilled) plans to build a border wall.
The bills should sail through the Republican-controlled House, but odds are that's as far as they will go. In recent years, House Republicans have ushered through similar bills only to see them go nowhere in the Senate, where Democrats would shoot them down. Morning Shift consulted three Senate Democratic aides who all said they expect to see the same thing happen this time. Republicans will "run into a resistance wall if they try to jam these two pieces through," one aide said. Read the "No Sanctuary for Criminals Act" here and "Kate's Law" here.

Saturday, June 25, 2016

We Cannot Have a Presidential Candidate Who Insults Mexicans and Latinos, women, African Americans, and Muslims.

Trump’s Racially Divisive Politics Must Be Exposed and Opposed !

The intolerant campaign  promoted by Donald Trump and supported  by the Republican Party is a call to the “silent white majority” and a demand that 11 million immigrants be deported.  This campaign promotes a dangerous and divisive racial message.  It must be vigorously opposed.

 Donald Trump is a serial liar, he  regularly incites political violence and he  is a  rampant xenophoberacist, and  misogynist.  He has repeatedly  pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S. He promises to build a wall on the border that would cost at least $35 billion to build, and billions each year to maintain.  And, it would not work.
Trump has an overly simplistic view of immigration: calling for  building  walls, breaking up families,  and deporting  people.  This fear mongering political message has found a very receptive base within our society among xenophobic and angry conservative older voters.

This campaign is dangerous.  It mobilizes right-wing  anti immigrant forces. Trump’s campaign is not just racism- it is a strategy to magnify racism to win the election – and we must defeat it.

We know these campaigns to be dangerous. He is promoting an anti Mexican, anti immigrant, anti Muslim agenda. This is more than the ranting of a fringe right. He is mainstreaming racism.

Friday, October 23, 2015

Dolores Huerta: The Latino Community Must Stand United

“The United States is a country of immigrants.” That is a phrase that is heard many times during each election cycle. And although the Latino and immigrant communities across the United States have always played a key role in all facets of government, business and society, we still continue to face a significant amount of challenges.
Yet, we continue to witness more anti-immigrant rhetoric across the mainstream media, while state legislatures — like North Carolina — enact laws that negatively affect Latinos. Meanwhile, too many politicians at all levels have used their soapboxes to spew ugly language that scapegoats and vilifies our communities.

We can change this.

As we inch ever closer to 2016, Latinos need to become aware of the true power that they wield. Every day we work hard to ensure that our communities remain vibrant, that our families continue to strengthen this great country, and that our loved ones are afforded a chance to pursue the American Dream. By our hard work, our dollars, and our ingenuity, we continue to ensure that this country grows and prospers.

Thursday, June 05, 2014

Latino Lawmakers Unveil Legislation to Repeal Un-American Proposition...



SACRAMENTO – Announcing a campaign to erase the stain of Proposition 187, the most mean-spirited proposition in California’s history, today, June 4, 2014, legislative leaders announced Senate Bill 396 to repeal Proposition 187.
“Today we remember the xenophobic sentiments that spurred Proposition 187, and we announce Senate Bill 396 to erase its stain from our law books. California will lead the country forward to a brighter day where immigrants are treated with dignity and given an opportunity to thrive,” said Senator Kevin de León, author of Senate Bill 396.
Irvis Orozco, a UC Davis student and Undocumented Student Activist spoke out, "If Prop 187 had been instituted and not found unconstitutional, I would have been denied the chance to get an education and become a leader in California and the nation that I love.”

Tuesday, July 09, 2013

Repressive Immigration Legislation in the House of Representatives



Two weeks ago, the Senate passed immigration reform with a robustly bipartisan 68-32 vote, and now the big question is what the House will do. So far, House Committees have approved five bills, none of which create a path to citizenship, and all of which contain provisions that would negatively impact our community members. (See short bill summaries below.)


On the eve of this meeting, ALL Representatives, Democrats and Republicans, need to hear from their constituents. Raise your voices and tell your Representative to focus on legislation that creates a pathway to citizenship and reunites families. 

Call: the Capitol Switchboard (202) 224-3121 and ask for your Representative or find your Representative's direct line at www.house.gov

Sample script: 

"I am from [City, State], and I urge Representative (name) to support immigration reform that creates a path to citizenship and reunites families. 

I urge the Representative to OPPOSE bills like the SAFE Act, Border Security Results Act, Agricultural Guestworker Act, and SKILLS Visas Act. These are not real reforms to our immigration system. We need immigration reform that creates a path to citizenship and reunites separated families."

Monday, June 25, 2012

Supreme Court blocks some of Arizona SB 1070



 The U.S. Supreme court today struck down most provisions of the Arizona law SB 1070 while sustaining one of its most controversial provisions.
The court sustained the “show me your papers” provision of the law that requires state law enforcement officers to determine the immigration status of anyone they stop or arrest.
The most conservative members of the court voted to sustain the entire law.  Imagine this.  Judges who consider themselves conservative support a law that requires all persons to carry papers to show their immigration/citizenship status.   This is a practice most often found in repressive regimes such as that of Syria or Nazi Germany.
The decision was a partial victory for the Obama administration, which had sued to block several parts of the law.

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Arizona SB 1070 to Supreme Court



You and I have witnessed the fallout from the current patchwork of state immigration laws: while we win victories in California and Illinois, we face devastating moral and humanitarian crises in Alabama and Arizona. A stance must be taken at the federal level to ensure that we can move forward to reform our immigration system as an entire nation.

Next month, the US Supreme Court will take on Arizona’s extreme anti-immigrant law, SB 1070.

The impact of the Supreme Court’s decision on SB 1070 can’t be overstated. For all those who have fought back against this racist law for nearly two years, this could be the moment our government declares once and for all that state-sponsored hate and racial profiling will be not be tolerated.

While the justices debate, we will be in the streets and online across the country, calling for justice and equality under the law for all immigrant families. We are planning for a week of action with national and grassroots partners, to make sure the court knows that the entire country will be following their decision.


Donna DeLa Cruz

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Alabama's anti immigrant campaign


SPLC Ready for Long Legal Battle Over Alabama’s Harsh Anti-Immigrant Law
            By Dan Werner, Deputy Legal Director
The Southern Poverty Law Center has won some encouraging victories in the months since we launched our effort to defeat Alabama’s harsh anti-immigrant law.
We’ve also had some disappointments. And we’ve seen this law bring fear and chaos to this state. More than 3,000 calls have poured into our hotline for immigrants affected by the law. But this legal battle is far from over. In fact, it’s just getting started.
Currently, the following provisions of HB 56 are in effect:
                Police are allowed to check the immigration status of people they stop and reasonably suspect are in the country unlawfully.
                All new contracts between an undocumented immigrant and another person are unenforceable in state court, with the exception of contracts for one night’s lodging, food purchases and medical services.
                It is a felony for undocumented immigrants to enter into a “business transaction” with the state of Alabama. The scope of this felony remains unclear, but includes applying for a driver’s license or a business license. The provision also include transactions with subdivisions of the state, such as cities and counties.
Beginning April 1, 2012, employers will be required to use e-verify to determine the immigration status of prospective employees.