Tuesday, September 29, 2020

Immigrant Struggles in the Time of Covid

Webinar: Immigrants’ Struggles in the Time of Covid/La lucha en los tiempos de Covid! 

Start: Monday, October 12, 2020  8:00 PM  Eastern Daylight Time (US & Canada) (GMT-04:00)

Host Contact Info:  immigrantrights@dsacommittees.org 

Join us for a  webinar: Immigrants’ Struggles in the Time of Covid/La lucha en los tiempos de Covid! by the Immigrants’ Rights Working Group of DSA.  Hear from  comrades on the front lines of the immigrants’ rights movement discussing the resistance in the concentration camps, struggles on the job, and find out ways for you  to get involved!

Join us for an evening of discussion.

Moderator: Alexander Hernandez – IMWG Steering Committee 

Adelina Nicholls, Executive Director, Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights (GLAHR). GLAHR educates, organizes and trains the Latino community in Georgia to defend and promote their civil and human rights. Their work has been crucial in exposing the atrocities taking place in Georgia ICE detention centers.

Rossy Alfaro from Migrant Justice. Migrant Justice is a grassroots organization founded and led by immigrant farmworkers sustaining Vermont's dairy industry. Our mission is to build the voice, capacity, and power of the farmworker community and engage community partners to organize for economic justice and human rights.

Jorge Mujica, IMWG Steering Committee, Organizador de trabajadores inmigrantes y de bajos ingresos con Arise Chicago/ Immigrant and low-income workers Organizer with Arise Chicago. Arise Chicago builds partnerships between faith communities and workers to fight workplace injustice through education, organizing, and advocating for public policy changes.

Edgar Franks, Political Director, Familias Unidas por la Justicia (FUJ). FUJ is an independent farmworker union of indigenous families located in Burlington, WA representing over 500 Triqui, Mixteco, and Spanish speaking workers at Sakuma Bros. Berry Farm. FUJ formed on July 11th, 2013 with the hopes of securing a better future for hand harvesters in the local berry fields of Whatcom and Skagit County.

SPONSORED BY
Email_banner

DSA Immigrants' Rights Working Group 

Monday, September 28, 2020

Cosas Que Debes Saber para detener un golpe de estado

 

 

Si bien es imprescindible mantener a la gente concentrada en un proceso electoral sólido y fuerte, también debemos prepararnos para un golpe de estado.

 

Daniel Hunter September 18, 2020

 

Tenemos un presidente que ha dicho abiertamente que podría no respetar el resultado de las elecciones. Tenemos que prepararnos por si declara su victoria antes de que se cuenten los votos, por si intenta detener el conteo de votos o por si se niega a aceptar la derrota.

Algunos días tengo confianza en que esto sucederá. Una encuesta mostró que más del 75 por ciento de los demócratas creen que esto es posible, ¡y un sorprendente 30 por ciento de los republicanos también lo creen!

Otros días estoy seguro de que se trata de la mano dura de un presidente que no planifica. Aún así, él es muy bueno en este tipo de despiste que puede mantenernos en una posición confiada y reaccionaria, lo que podría llevarnos a dejar de hacer el importante trabajo de base para conseguir el voto, proteger la oficina de correos y luchar contra la represión del voto.


·  We need a plan to prevent a Trump takeover — and this anti-coup research shows the way

Lo que sugiero no es que dejemos de hacer lo que estamos haciendo ahora. De hecho, soy parte de un esfuerzo colectivo llamado Choose Democracy, que está preparando a la gente para la posibilidad de un golpe de estado, al tiempo que la mantiene enfocada en un proceso electoral sólido y fuerte. Después de todo, la mejor manera de detener un golpe es evitarlo.

Estas pautas provienen de un número amplio de experiencias y evidencias de los muchos países que han experimentado un golpe de estado desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Algunos casos de estudio detallados pueden encontrarse en Choose Democracy o en un manual más extenso basado en evidencias, pertinente para el momento presente, llamado “Hold the Line: A Guide to Defender Democracy.”

1. No espere resultados la noche de las elecciones.

La temporada de elecciones 2020 se perfila bastante extraña. Es posible que muchas papeletas enviadas por correo no se cuenten hasta días o semanas después del día de las elecciones. Ya que se espera que los demócratas utilicen el voto por correo con más frecuencia que los republicanos, se espera que el conteo de votos por correo se mueva hacia el lado demócrata la noche después de las elecciones (lo llaman un “cambio azul”). Como resultado, una ola de confusión puede desarrollarse a partir de la noche de las elecciones.

El extraño Colegio Electoral crea múltiples puntos de intervención. Después de la noche de las elecciones (3 de noviembre), la denuncia falsa de votos fraudulentos puede ocasionar que un fiscal general descarriado u otros funcionarios gubernamentales intenten detener el recuento o excluir los votos.

A medida que los resultados de las elecciones comiencen a llegar, el mensaje debe ser alto y claro: cuenten todos los votos y respeten el resultado.

El 14 de diciembre, los delegados del Colegio Electoral se reúnen y votan por el resultado de su estado. Por lo general, esto se hace sin fanfarrias, pero en los estados en disputa, es posible que veamos a los gobernadores y legisladores estatales declarando resultados diferentes: uno que refleje los resultados de los votantes; el otro que reclame que “es un fraude” y “nosotros sabemos más”. Esto es preocupante en estados “oscilantes” como Pennsylvania, donde el gobernador y la legislatura estatal son de partidos diferentes.

El nuevo Congreso resolverá todos estos problemas el 6 de enero. Y si la Cámara de Representantes y el Senado no están de acuerdo con el resultado, entonces se desarrolla un proceso complicado en el que la Cámara recién asentada, a través del proceso de un estado/un voto, determina al presidente. Mientras tanto, el Senado (por mayoría) vota por el nuevo vicepresidente. (#ShutDownDC proporciona un desglose visual paso a paso de este proceso).

Durante este tiempo, espere afirmaciones falsas y extravagantes. Tenga mucho cuidado con las noticias. No se limite a transmitir cualquier cosa que parezca un ejemplo dramático de irregularidades, pero tómese el tiempo para verificar que la noticia sea cierta, ya desacreditada o de una fuente en la que no confía. Anime a las personas de su comunidad a prepararse para algunas semanas de incertidumbre. A medida que los resultados de las elecciones comiencen a llegar, el mensaje debe ser claro: cuenten todos los votos y respeten los resultados.

2. Llámalo un golpe de estado.

Una de las razones por las que es importante usar el lenguaje de un golpe de estado es que la gente sabe que está mal y que es una violación de las normas democráticas, incluso si no están familiarizados con la definición exacta de golpe de estado.

Tenemos que estar preparados para declarar alto y claro: esto es un golpe de estado.

Expresiones como “manipulación electoral” o “supresión del voto” señalan el deterioro del proceso democrático. Pero si entramos en un escenario de golpe (donde Trump simplemente no dejará la presidencia) debemos ayudar a otras personas a facilitar a nuestro país esta entrada en una crisis.

Sabemos que es un golpe de estado si el gobierno:

  • Deja de contar votos;
  • Declara ganador a alguien que no obtuvo la mayor cantidad de votos; o
  • Permite que permanezca en el poder alguien que no ganó las elecciones.

Estas son líneas rojas que la gente puede captar de inmediato (y en las que la mayoría de los estadounidenses sigue creyendo).

Las personas que toman el poder de manera autoritaria reivindican que lo hacen para salvar la democracia o afirman que conocen los resultados electorales “reales”. Así que esto no tiene por qué parecer un golpe militar con un líder ordenando el arresto de la oposición. Si alguno de esos tres principios es violado, tenemos que declarar alto y claro: Esto es un golpe de estado.

3. Sepa que la gente común ha detenido golpes de estado.

Se han producido intentos de golpe en todo el mundo y más de la mitad han fracasado. Eso es porque los golpes de estado son difíciles de orquestar. Son una violación de las normas que requieren la rápida toma de múltiples niveles de las instituciones del estado con el reclamo de que son los herederos legítimos.

Los golpes tienden a fracasar cuando se confía en las instituciones gubernamentales (como las elecciones), hay una ciudadanía activa y otras naciones están listas para participar.

El papel de la ciudadanía es fundamental. Eso se debe a que, durante el período inmediatamente posterior a un intento de golpe de estado, cuando el nuevo gobierno afirma que es el gobierno “real”, todas las instituciones tienen que decidir a quién escuchar.

Para comenzar a prepararse, hable con al menos 5 personas que irían a la calle con usted; la forma más segura de salir a la calle es con personas que conoce y en las que confía.

Un golpe fallido en Alemania en 1920 nos sirve de ejemplo. La población se sintió abatida por la derrota en la Primera Guerra Mundial y el alto desempleo. Los nacionalistas de derecha organizaron un golpe y consiguieron la ayuda de algunos generales para apoderarse de los edificios gubernamentales. El gobierno depuesto huyó, pero ordenó a todos los ciudadanos que les obedecieran. “Ninguna empresa debe funcionar mientras reine la dictadura militar,” declararon.

Rápidamente comenzó una resistencia pacífica generalizada. Las imprentas se negaron a imprimir los periódicos del nuevo gobierno. Los funcionarios públicos se negaron a cumplir las órdenes de los golpistas. Y se difundieron en avión y a mano folletos que pedían el final del golpe.

Hay una historia del líder golpista deambulando por los pasillos buscando en vano una secretaria que mecanografíe sus proclamas. Los actos de resistencia crecieron y finalmente el gobierno democrático (que aún tenía graves problemas) recuperó el poder.

Los momentos posteriores a un golpe son momentos de heroísmo de la población general. Así es como la democracia se hace real.

4. Prepárese para actuar con rapidez – y no lo haga solo.

Normalmente, las tomas de poder se organizan en secreto y se lanzan de repente. La mayoría de las campañas que derrotan los golpes de estado lo hacen en días: la Unión Soviética, en 1991, tomó tres días; Francia, en 1961, tomó cuatro días, y Bolivia, en 1978, tomó 16 días.

PREVIOUS COVERAGE

·  A person holding a sign

Description automatically generatedMass direct action might be the only way to stop Trump from stealing the election

Es raro que el líder de un país admita públicamente que tal vez no respete los resultados de una elección. Esto es una buena noticia, porque las personas que detienen los golpes rara vez tienen la oportunidad de recibir entrenamiento, una advertencia o preparación alguna. De esta manera, les llevamos la delantera.

Un grupo de expertos de D.C. llamado Transition Integrity Project ejecutó múltiples simulaciones, como lo que podría suceder si Biden gana por un pequeño margen o si Trump simplemente declara la victoria sin que haya un ganador claro. En cada simulación concluyeron que una “cantidad importante de personas en las calles puede ser decisiva”. Las personas comunes marcan la diferencia.

5. Enfóquese en los valores democráticos compartidos por todos, no en valores individuales.

En Argentina, en 1987, se inició un golpe de Estado cuando un alto mando de la Fuerza Aérea, resentido por los intentos de democratizar al ejército y ponerlo bajo el control civil, organizó a cientos de soldados en su base.

Mientras el gobierno civil intentaba negociar discretamente un acuerdo, la gente salió a las calles. Contra las súplicas del gobierno, 500 ciudadanos comunes marcharon a la base con el lema “¡Viva la democracia! ¡Argentina! ¡Argentina!”. Podrían haberse dedicado a atacar directamente al alto mando. En cambio, estaban apelando a sus conciudadanos para que eligieran la democracia.

El militar trató de mantenerlos alejados con un tanque de guerra, pero los manifestantes entraron a la base de todos modos, y él sabía que disparar abiertamente contra civiles no violentos le haría perder más credibilidad. Pronto 400.000 personas salieron a las calles de Buenos Aires para manifestarse en contra del golpe.

Los golpes no son un momento para quedarse mirando y esperando hasta que “alguien más” decida qué hacer. No importa quién sea, usted puede ser una parte en el rescate de la democracia.

Esto dio fuerza al gobierno civil (que en gran parte había estado ausente). Las organizaciones civiles, la iglesia católica, los grupos empresariales y los sindicatos se unieron bajo el compromiso de “apoyar de todas las formas posibles la constitución, el desarrollo normal de las instituciones de gobierno y la democracia como la única forma de vida viable”. Los golpistas perdieron su legitimidad y pronto se rindieron.

Este enfoque es diferente al de los manifestantes que salen a la calle con una lista de problemas o una queja contra un líder vilipendiado. En cambio, es una exaltación de valores democráticos fundamentales ampliamente compartidos. En nuestro proyecto usamos la expresión “elegir la democracia”.

Esto afirma otro hallazgo de la investigación antigolpista: debido a que los golpes son un ataque a la institución actual, las personas leales a la forma tradicional, quienes quizás nunca se unan a otras causas del movimiento, están abiertos a unirse a acciones directas en la calle. Eso pasará si basamos la invitación en la importancia de cuidar los valores democráticos con los que se conectan.

6. Convenza a la gente de que no se congele o simplemente siga adelante.

Imagine que en su trabajo despiden a un jefe corrupto y traen a uno nuevo. Y en lugar de irse, su antiguo jefe dice: “Todavía estoy a cargo. Haz lo que te digo”. Un grupo de tus compañeros de trabajo dicen: “Sólo recibimos órdenes del antiguo jefe”. En ese momento, surge la duda.

Esa duda es la que hace que los golpes triunfen. Demasiada gente se congela. Incluso cuando solo unas pocas personas están de acuerdo con el golpe y actúan como si fuera normal, la gente puede llegar a aceptarlo de mala gana como inevitable.

En toda la investigación sobre la prevención de golpes, hay un tema en común: la gente deja de hacer lo que los golpistas le dicen que haga.

 

 

Thursday, September 24, 2020

Choose Democracy : Resist Authoritarianism

 Choose Democracy : Resist Authoritarianism

Choose DemocracyWe can stop an undemocratic power grab, but only if we prepare and together, choose democracy.

Democracy is fragile. We have reason to worry that this fall we may see an undemocratic power grab — a coup. We also know that the people can defend our democracy. Nonviolent mass protests have stopped coups in other places, and we may have to do the same in this country.

Elections work because the public agrees to honor the results. Similarly, coups work only if the public honors them. When the public refuses to accept the coup as legitimate, coups fall apart. Refusal looks like millions of people using nonviolent tools to delegitimize the coup by demonstrating, resisting orders, and shutting down the country until democracy prevails.

That’s why we are committing now to choose democracy: by voting, making sure all the votes are counted, and preparing to take the streets in the case of a coup.

Together, we choose democracy.



OUR PLEDGE:
We will vote.
We will refuse to accept election results until all the votes are counted.
We will nonviolently take to the streets if a coup is attempted.
If we need to, we will shut down this country to protect the integrity of the democratic process

 

Wednesday, September 16, 2020

ICE Violates Women

 


The outcry over ICE and hysterectomies

US Immigration and Customs Enforcement is facing allegations that women detained at one of the agency’s facilities in Ocilla, Georgia, underwent unnecessary gynecological procedures, including hysterectomies.

The allegations began with a nurse, Dawn Wooten, who filed a whistleblower complaint on Monday that cited concerns about a seemingly high number of hysterectomies performed on immigrants detained at the facility.

On Wednesday, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, the vice chair of the House immigration subcommittee, said in a statement that she had been briefed by three attorneys representing detainees at the facility. At minimum, she said, 17 or 18 people held at the Irwin County Detention Center had been subjected to unnecessary gynecological procedures — often “with the clear intention of sterilization” and without obtaining proper consent.

“It has become painfully clear to me that the initial reports ... are likely part of a pattern of conduct,” Jayapal said. 

Many of the details of the allegations against the Georgia facility are still emerging, and both ICE and the private operator of the facility have called for skepticism of the complaint, which relies on secondhand accounts of the hysterectomies that were allegedly performed. Attorneys have since come forward with firsthand accounts of such procedures, but it is not clear to what extent ICE and the medical staff involved sought the detainees’ consent to perform those procedures or whether they were medically necessary. 

But the accusations, which echo of the ugly history of coercive sterilization in the US, have sparked widespread outrage — including calls for formal investigations. But this is far from the first time that ICE, the federal agency charged with enforcing immigration law in the US, has been accused of neglecting immigrants’ health and safety, especially amid the coronavirus pandemic. 

“I don’t think this is necessarily a systemic sterilization by ICE. I think this is the kind of thing that is allowed to flourish in the course of poor oversight and terrible, inhumane conditions of confinement,” said Sarah Owings, an attorney for one of the detainees, told NBC

The complaint describes one gynecologist as a “uterus collector”

The initial disclosed complaint, filed by a nurse, Dawn Wooten, in cooperation with a coalition of immigrant rights groups led by nonprofit activist group Project South, said female detainees had been subjected to a troublingly high number of hysterectomies while in custody at the Georgia facility.

As first reported by Prism, the procedures were allegedly performed by Mahendra Amin, a gynecologist associated with Coffee Regional Medical Center and Irwin County Hospital in Georgia. In 2015, Amin and several other doctors reached a more than $500,000 civil settlement with Georgia prosecutors to resolve allegations that they submitted fraudulent claims to Medicaid and Medicare. 

Wooten is quoted in the complaint about the doctor: “We’ve questioned among ourselves, like, goodness he’s taking everybody’s stuff out. … That’s his specialty, he’s the uterus collector.” 

But the detention facility, which is operated by the private prison contractor LaSalle Corrections, continued to send patients to him. 

According to Wooten’s complaint, the detainees, many of whom have limited English skills, were allegedly sent to a gynecologist outside the facility who performed the hysterectomies, often without them fully understanding why they were getting the procedure done. One woman was told it was because she had a “thick womb” or “heavy bleeding,” even though she had never experienced heavy bleeding or been told by a doctor previously that she had a thick womb, according to the complaint. 

BuzzFeed reported that ICE informed lawmakers Tuesday that the detention center had only “referred” two detainees for hysterectomies to outside health care providers since 2018, and that the procedures had been approved by the facility clinical authority. Still, it’s possible that detainees could have received hysterectomies without being specifically referred for the procedure.

Several attorneys representing detainees who had been treated by Amin came forward with similar allegations on Tuesday. One attorney, Benjamin Osorio, told NBC News that Amin performed hysterectomies on two of his clients that they think may have been medically unnecessary.

Hysterectomies can be commonly used to treat noncancerous growths in the uterus that contribute to heavy periods and painful sex, as well as endometriosis, pelvic support issues, abnormal uterine bleedings, chronic pelvic pain, and gynecologic cancers. But the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists advises that, depending on a patient’s condition and comfort level, they may “want to try other options first that do not involve surgery” or see if the condition improves on its own first, waiting to perform the hysterectomy until a woman no longer wants to bear children. 

 

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/9/15/21437805/whistleblower-hysterectomies-nurse-irwin-ice

 

 

  

Sunday, September 13, 2020

Biden Blunder !


 

Biden pick creates furor, underscoring bitterness over Obama immigration policy

BY RAFAEL BERNAL - 09/09/20 06:00 AM EDT 1,296  Posted from The Hill,

 

Dime con quién andas !


 

 

  

Immigration advocates are livid over the Biden transition team’s addition of Cecilia Muñoz, a former Obama administration official who was the public face of that administration’s immigration policy.

Muñoz, who once served as the head of former President Obama’s White House Domestic Policy Council, was named by the Biden campaign Friday as part of a group of eight new senior transition advisers.

The pick was quickly criticized by immigration reform advocates, a reaction that exhibited both ideological divides within the Democratic Party and a lingering resentment felt by many immigration advocates over the actions of the Obama administration, particularly in its first term.


“Huge mistake. Huge. Huge mistake. Worst part? We have no other option. I guess we gotta pick our opponent. That’s what it has come down to,” wrote Erika Andiola, an immigrant rights activist and advocacy director for The Refugee and Immigrant Center for Education and Legal Services.

Muñoz, a policy expert who cut her teeth at UnidosUS, then known as the National Council of La Raza, before joining the Obama administration, became a lightning rod for criticism of Obama’s immigration policy.

“If Biden wins, no one from the Obama administration should be allowed to touch the immigration policy portfolio,” said Pablo Manríquez, a former Democratic National Committee spokesman who’s been overtly critical of Obama on immigration.

“Cecilia Muñoz is the one person besides [Trump White House aide] Stephen Miller who has spent years of her public service dedicated to the smooth execution of mass deportation policy at the West Wing level,” said Manríquez.

The criticism reflects in part the view that Muñoz did not advocate enough for immigration rights during internal discussions in the Obama White House. Instead, advocates say she too often defended policies that led to the deportation of more than 2 million people.

“She was the person in the White House who shielded Obama from all the flak,” said Amy Maldonado, an immigration lawyer whose clients include minors in detention.

“The whole reason she was in that room was to give a perspective they weren’t hearing, and instead she covered for them,” added Maldonado.

The criticism comes as Biden continues to underperform with Latino voters, a fact that is alarming to many Democrats.

An NBC News-Marist poll released Tuesday found Biden trailing Trump among Latino voters in Florida, 50 percent to 46 percent. In 2016, by contrast, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton beat Trump among Florida Latinos by 25 points, according to exit polls. 

Biden has slowly but surely distanced himself from Obama’s more aggressive immigration policies, and Maldonado said there was no question for her about backing Biden over Trump, even if Biden brought back all of the Obama-era policies.

“Between Trump and Biden there is no choice. Children literally die in detention under this administration,” she said.

Other voices defended the Obama administration, saying it changed in the second term.

“Immigration policy under the Obama-Biden administration was not a singular thing, it evolved over time for a lot of reasons,” said Tom Jawetz, vice president of immigration at the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

“While there were some bumps in the road, they showed some growth,” said Jawetz.

Muñoz has both White House experience and immigration expertise, which makes her a natural fit for Biden’s team. In 2000, she won a MacArthur Foundation “genius grant” for her work on immigration policy.

A former Capitol Hill staffer with deep knowledge of immigration deliberations during the Obama administration lauded Muñoz, saying “she was advocating for immigration reform and the president leaning in to immigration in a positive way.”

Muñoz remained publicly loyal to Obama when the then-president was referred to by some as the deporter in chief, something perceived by some in the immigration space as a betrayal.

“There were lots of moments when people thought she should resign in protest and she didn’t. She stuck with it and it earned her a lot of enemies on the pro-immigrant left,” said the former staffer.


But immigration advocates see Muñoz as a policy expert who will likely depend on the political leadership of Biden and his core team to mark a direction on immigration for the Democratic nominee.

“Cecilia Muñoz is one of several experienced advisors leading teams focused on establishing strong infrastructure for federal agencies dealing with domestic and economic policy. The transition team’s focus is ensuring there is a strong policy apparatus across government that can support the Biden-Harris Administration’s policies on day one,” said a Biden transition official.

Along with Muñoz’s appointment, New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham(D) was announced as one of four co-chairs for the transition team, a hierarchical step above Muñoz.

Lujan Grisham led the Congressional Hispanic Caucus in the first two years of the Trump administration and was a vocal defender of immigrant rights and proponent of immigration reform.

Winning over Latino voters, in any event, is likely to come down to Biden himself.

  




Winning over Latino voters, in any event, is likely to come down to Biden himself.

Friday, September 11, 2020

Voting Power

SACRAMENTO PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE: Voting Power: The Poor People’s Campaign: A National Call for Moral Revival is non-partisan  but deeply committed to moral politics and public policy.  Fo...

Monday, September 07, 2020

UFW Begins Boycott of Foster Farms

 

 On Monday, the United Farm Workers (UFW) held a virtual news conference —along with the Jakarta Movement Punjabi Sikh organization and Faith  in the Valley— pledging to boycott Foster Farms, the poultry processing plant in Livingston, California, after nine workers died from the novel coronavirus and 358 tested positive.

The Merced County Health Department had made several recommendations, including recommendations to conduct widespread testing, to Foster Farms during a survey back in June when the outbreak started.

According to the UFW, Foster Farms did not comprehensively follow many of the recommendations.

“United Farm Workers has tried to work as a team with Foster Farms since the early days of the pandemic. Until fairly recently, we have tried to take a collaborative approach with the company as we felt this was the fastest way for us to help protect as many workers as possible,” said Elizabeth Strater, UFW’s Director of Alternative Organizing. “As time has gone on, and especially since late July, we have been increasingly disturbed to realize that the company was not going to meet us or the workers halfway.”

A vigil for the nine workers who died was held on Thursday night.

According to an August 26 order from Merced County Health Department telling Foster Farms to close its facilities for not complying to the previous recommendations, “of the approximate 2,600 workers at the Livingston facility, 13.7 percent of the workforce has received a positive test result based on worker self-reporting.” However, this figure does not represent the extent of the outbreak in the facility because Foster Farms did not conduct universal testing.

“There are hundreds of families now affected by sickness. There are at least nine families grieving the death of people they love. Still, Foster Farms is delaying the closure of the facility and we still have not been provided clear details by Foster on the testing performed to date,” Strater said.

Martha Vera’s husband was a trucker for Foster Farms for 27 years. A few days before he passed away from COVID-19 complications, he told Martha that people were infected onsite, and that they were still working at the plant.

“I just want to say that this company, they obviously don’t care about the workers they only care about the money. I have worked there for 26 years,” Vera said during the conference. “I hope that someone can tell Foster Farms that they need to take action. How many more workers need to die before they are able to finally take action to protect employees.”

José de Piña Tovar, who has been working at Foster Farms for 15 years, said he and his wife were infected while working in the plant back in June during the conference.

“Foster Farms should have a clean plant. They need to provide the necessary equipment to protect us. I suggest that everyone working in the plant needs to be tested. At least every eight days, to ensure that we are all safe from COVID-19,” said Piña Tovar, who is still recovering from the virus.

During the conference, UFW members pledged to support a boycott if Foster Farms continues failing to provide a safe workplace, which includes complying with the county order to close the entire Livingston facility, testing all workers (including cleaning crews) with public results and weekly testing once the facility reopens, providing paid leave while the plant is closed and “quarantine pay,” supplying hazard pay, and to provide PPE equipment to all employees.

The company released a statement saying in part that “the Central Valley in California, where many of Foster Farms’ facilities are located, has been especially hard-hit. Foster Farms is initiating a comprehensive testing program across all of its California facilities beginning on August 12, at its main Livingston plant. Foster Farms tested nearly 2,900 employees and found a COVID-19 prevalence of less than 1%. We are encouraged by these results but recognize there is even more to do and will begin additional testing and sanitation this week.”

County officials ordered the facility to close on August 27, but Foster Farms delayed its closure, asking workers to come back to work the next day. It closed its main plant on September 1, but other parts of Foster Farms are still open.

***

Diego Jesús Bartesaghi Mena is a 2020 Latino Rebels summer correspondent. A recent graduate of Columbia Journalism School, he is based in Newark, NJ and tweets from @bartesaghi_mena.

 

https://www.latinorebels.com/2020/09/04/ufwfosterfarms/