Wednesday, December 13, 2023

MAGA Republicans exploit Immigration Policy Mess


U.S. immigration policy is a mess. It was made worse by the Trump administration, 2016-2020.   Now, Republicans are now using immigration policy disputes to hold up needed military aid to Ukraine.  
In his campaign  in November Trump has promised the largest deportation in U.S. history. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/11/us/politics/trump-2025-immigration-agenda.html?

Here is what the Republicans Passed on Tues.


Here is what the House passed on Dec.12.2023
www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2/text#toc-HB7761D89FC4C49ACBD0DF56E657FC6AE
https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/2/text#toc-HB7761D89FC4C49ACBD0DF56E657FC6AE
 

 

Facts about immigration. From the Anti Defamation League.

https://www.adl.org/resources/fact-sheet/eight-facts-about-immigrants-and-immigration-english-and-espanol

 

In an age of disinformation and bigotry, misconceptions about immigrants and anti-immigrant hate have spread throughout American politics and society. As a result, this country has seen a concerning uptick in rhetoric, policies, and social movements that threaten to or directly harm immigrants and refugees. This resource contains information and sources that set the record straight and will hopefully help mitigate the damage caused by disinformation about immigrants. 

The following are basic well-documented facts about immigrants, each discussed in more detail below:

  • Immigrants do not endanger public health.
  • Immigrants cannot vote until they become citizens.
  • Immigrants create jobs and improve the United States economy.
  • Most immigrants in the United States hold lawful status.
  • Throughout U.S. history, the percentage of immigrants has remained steady.
  • Immigrants are less likely than U.S.-born citizens to commit crimes or become incarcerated.
  • Immigrants are usually ineligible for social service benefits.
  • Terrorists have rarely entered the country illegally via the U.S.-Mexico border.

Fact: Immigrants do not endanger public health.

People who vilify immigrants and blame them for the United States' problems claim that they bring diseases  into the U.S. from beyond our borders. There is no evidence that immigrants have been the source of any modern disease outbreaks in the U.S.

When the COVID-19 pandemic broke out in 2020, policies attempting to bar immigrants and refugees from entering into the United States were based on unfounded grounds of public health concerns and fear of spreading COVID-19. As the pandemic took hold, health experts stressed that continuing immigration and asylum processing would not further spread the coronavirus, but rather that closing the border would actually negatively affect public health by contributing to overcrowding on both sides of the border. Moreover, prior to entry into the U.S., immigrants are required to undergo a medical examination to screen for certain communicable diseases.

Fact: Immigrants cannot vote until they become citizens.

Politicians and others who want to restrict immigration claim that undocumented immigrants are able to vote. Immigrants – including undocumented immigrants – cannot register to vote until they gain citizenship, regardless of whether a state issues them a driver’s license. Sixteen states and the District of Columbia permit undocumented immigrants to obtain state identification cards in the form of driver’s licenses, and all states issue identification documents to immigrants who hold temporary and permanent visas. These licenses provide a valid identification and promote public safety but do not entitle immigrants to vote in elections.

To vote, all states but one  require that a person first register to vote. and in order to do that, an applicant must attain and affirm their U.S. citizenship. There are many serious safeguards in place to ensure that only citizens can vote; that anyone who attempts to subvert this rule is subject to severe punishment; and that any such attempts never result in the counting of unauthorized votes.

Fact: Immigrants create jobs and improve the United States economy.

Some people  seek to exploit misunderstandings of the U.S. labor market and tax system by stoking concerns that more immigrants means fewer jobs and less access to social programs for citizens. In fact, immigrants help create new jobs. In addition to buying U.S. and local products, which helps create jobs, immigrants often start their own businesses. States with large numbers of immigrants report lower unemployment rates for everyone.

In 2019, immigrants collectively paid more than $492 billion in taxes, including more than $30 billion in taxes paid by undocumented immigrants.  Everyone pays sales taxes on goods they purchase and property taxes on the homes they buy, and more than half of all undocumented immigrant households file income tax returns using Individual Tax Identification Numbers.

Fact: Most immigrants in the U.S. hold lawful status.

Some individuals and anti-immigrant activists claim that most immigrants in the U.S. did not go through a legal process to live here. In fact, the large majority of immigrants (77%) have lawful status.

In 2017, 45% of immigrants were naturalized citizens and 27% were lawful permanent residents (sometimes referred to as Green Card holders). The remaining 28% of immigrants are refugees and asylum seekers, people who are in the U.S. on temporary visas (including student and work visas), and undocumented immigrants.

As of 2019, there were an estimated 10.5 million to 12 million undocumented immigrants living in the U.S., or less than 4% percent of the nation's population.

Fact: Throughout U.S. history, the percentage of immigrants has remained steady. 

Those aiming to  sow fear about the rising number of immigrants in the U.S. often cite  misleading, out-of-context statistics. While there are more immigrants living in the U.S. than ever before, there are also more people living in the U.S. than ever beforeThe percentage of immigrants in the overall population is not much different than many other times throughout our history.

In fact, the percentage of immigrants in the U.S. is about the same now as it was over a hundred years ago. Today, immigrants make up approximately 13.7% of the total U.S. population. From 1900 to 1930, immigrants made up between 12% and 15% of the population, and similar spikes occurred in the 1850s and 1880s. During those periods, immigrants successfully became part of U.S. society, helping to build the thriving and diverse country we have now, and this process has always been true regardless of the country of origin, race, or religion of the immigrants. There is no reason to believe today’s immigrants are any different.

Fact: Immigrants are less likely than U.S.-born citizens to commit crimes or become incarcerated.

Some claim that immigrants do not abide by the law. They cite anecdotal evidence or individual cases where immigrants have done something unlawful and use these cases to cast all immigrants as criminals. Study after study has shown that immigrants — regardless of where they are from, what immigration status they hold, and how much education they have completed — are less likely than native-born citizens to commit crimes or become incarcerated.

According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, while the overall percentage of immigrants and the number of undocumented immigrants in the U.S. both increased between 1990 and 2016, the violent crime rate in the U.S. during that time plummeted 48 percent and the property crime rate dropped by 41 percent. More recent population and crime data from the Pew Research Center reveals the continuation of this trend.  Studies have consistently found that immigrants are less likely to be incarcerated than native-born Americans and that there is a negative correlation between levels of immigration and crime ratesOther studies have found that crime rates are lowest in states with the highest immigration growth rates, and that states with larger shares of undocumented immigrants tend to have lower crime rates than states with smaller shares.

Fact: Immigrants are usually ineligible for social service benefits.

Some suggest that immigrants use too many public benefits or take advantage of the social safety net provided to citizens. In fact, most immigrants who come to the U.S. work hard to take care of their families and themselves. Moreover, many studies have shown that, on average, immigrants pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits.

With very few exceptions (such as access to medical care for victims of human trafficking), undocumented immigrants, temporary residents, and even newly-arrived permanent residents are not eligible for federal public benefits such as Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, and food stamps. Green card holders generally are not entitled to these benefits until they have been in the country in permanent resident status for five years or longer. This means that many immigrants have contributions to these programs deducted from their paychecks but cannot access the benefits. According to a 2018 study by the CATO Institute, eligible immigrants use 27% fewer benefits relative to people of similar incomes and ages born with U.S. citizenship.

The $2 trillion 2020 CARES Act, which gave financial relief in light of COVID-19 to most taxpayers, excluded millions of immigrants without a Social Security Number from receiving stimulus checks – though many immigrants pay taxes and continue to work in essential jobs including healthcare.

Fact: Terrorists have rarely entered the country illegally through the U.S.-Mexico border.

Those looking to blame immigrants for national security issues exaggerate the risk of political extremists entering the U.S. from Mexico. There is little credible evidence that terrorists are routinely entering the U.S. through the border with Mexico. To date there have been zero deaths or injuries on U.S. soil as a result of acts committed by terrorists illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, while the domestic threat has been steadily growing for years. Between 2002 and 2018, 90% of Islamist extremist plots and attacks in the United States were carried out by U.S. citizens or individuals living in the country with lawful permanent or temporary status. In 2019, of the nine individuals arrested for plotting attacks linked to Islamist extremism, seven (78%) were U.S. citizens. Furthermore, domestic extremism, which poses the greater threat to people living in the United States, is primarily driven by right-wing extremists and particularly white supremacists, many of whom hold specifically anti-immigrant beliefs.

According to a report released by the U.S Department of State, Bureau of Counterterrorism in 2019, “Counterterrorism cooperation between Mexico and the United States remained strong in 2019. There was no credible evidence indicating international terrorist groups established bases in Mexico, worked directly with Mexican drug cartels, or sent operatives via Mexico into the United States.”

One recent exception wasthe arrest of two individuals on the terror watchlist attempting to cross the border in early 2021. Notably, both of these individuals were caught and stopped from crossing the border.

Sources

Fact: Immigrants do not endanger public health  

https://www.publichealth.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/public_health_experts_letter_05.18.2020.pdf  

https://www.cdc.gov/immigrantrefugeehealth/exams/medical-examination-faqs.html#3

Fact: Immigrants cannot vote until they become citizens. 

https://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/states-offering-driver-s-licenses-to-immigrants.aspx

https://www.uscis.gov/forms/explore-my-options/proof-of-citizenship-for-us-citizens#:~:text=You%20are%20a%20U.S.%20citizen,%2D550%2C%20Certificate%20of%20Naturalization%3B&text=Form%20FS%2D240%2C%20Report%20of,of%20United%20States%20Citizen%3B%20or  

Fact: Immigrants create jobs and improve the United States economy.

https://insight.kellogg.northwestern.edu/article/immigrants-to-the-u-s-create-more-jobs-than-they-take

https://www.newamericaneconomy.org/locations/national/

 


 
For background, readers should look at Operation Wetback under President Dwight D. Eisenhower and the so-called Mexican Repatriation project of the 1930’s. 
The implementation of Operation Wetback was a result of Attorney General Herbert Brownell's tour of Southern California in August 1953. It was there that he made note of the "shocking and unsettling" issue that was illegal immigration.
[2] The short-lived operation used military-style tactics to remove Mexican immigrants—some of them American citizens—from the United States. Though millions of Mexicans had legally entered the country through joint immigration programs in the first half of the 20th century and some were naturalized citizens who were once native, Operation Wetback was designed to send them to Mexico.[3]
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Wetback
 
Operation Wetback was a follow-up to the prior Mexican Repatriation when as many as 2 million were deported, many of them children.  Up to 40% of those deported were U.S. citizens of Mexican descent. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Repatriation
 
Currently there is a competition among Republicans to be the toughest on immigration policy by focusing on fentanyl, which commonly begins production in China.
 
The current Mexican government   of Andrés Manuel López Obradorhas made major strides toward advancing democracy  and the rule of law in Mexico since 2018.  This effort is not at all complete.   Illegal, well-armed, cartels control some areas of Mexico.  There are at least four major cartels, and dozens of affiliated cartels.  For example, the Sinaloa cartel is the largest. Based in Culiacán, the cartel also controls Juarez and much of the border area.  Others cartels operate freely in other regions of the country.  
This week Ron DeSantis, Nickie Haley, and Vivek Rasmaswamy each have proposed some version of sending in U.S. military or a few missiles to take out the cartels. 
 
U.S. police intervention in Mexico was tried and advanced during prior Mexican governments.  1990-2018.  It failed.  Little progress was made, in significant part due to corruption of the government offices.
 
If the U.S. were now to act upon Republican statements and   fire a couple of missiles into Mexico the result would be to advance the control of one of the cartels over a different cartel.    We know this from prior efforts. For example, the joint Mexican/ US effort from 2006-2014, weakened some cartels, and strengthened  the Sinaloa cartel. In reality, the U.S. intervention helped the Sinaloa cartel.
 
Suppose, as candidate  Vivek proposed this week, we send in a few missiles to take out a cartel. 
Well, first, that would strengthen other cartels who would be pleased to move into their territory.  And then, suppose the Sinaloa cartel responded by sending a few missiles into Dallas or Ft. Worth? What would be our next steps? 
 
What the Mexican government has been asking for as policy, particularly in the last 20 years, is that the U.S. should  assist by controlling the shipment of guns and arms from the U.S. to the cartels.  Mexico manufactures almost no weapons.  It is illegal there.  The guns, bombs, and other weapons are coming from the U.S. market. The Mexican Government is often out-gunned in efforts to oppose cartel violence.  The cartels get their massive weapons from the U.S.
 
Why do you suppose the proposal to limit gun sales and transfers  is not discussed in the U.S. in Republican circles?
And, why is it so little discussed in U.S. media ?
 
President Lopez-Obrador’s  alternative proposals are to build a more democratic state. To create jobs for young people so they will have careers rather than join the cartels.   And, he is working to  rebuild a police force that is not corrupt.  He urgently needs control of gun traffic from the U.S.
 
What could the U.S. do? 
Well, first, we should get control of gun manufacturing, sales, and theft in the U.S.  We are not doing this because the U.S. gun lobby controls one of the two political parties and half of the second party. 
 
In place of building a wall that does not work and building massive new detention centers as proposed by candidate Trump, the U.S. could spend the money to provide adequate electronic searches of vehicles crossing the border.  Most Fentanyl comes in in large trucks. Not in back packs.  This has been a part of the Biden Administration’s  proposal for immigration reform. The Republican Congress refuses to fund such a policy.  
 

Duane Campbell 

Thursday, December 07, 2023

Farm workers forced out of Migrant Housing - California


Many migrant farmworkers living in California-run housing would settle full time in their communities if they could find affordable housing. Their children struggle to keep up in school as a result of frequent moves.

This is what The Sacramento Bee learned during a year-long investigation into California’s 24 migrant farmworker housing centers, which provide subsidized units for seasonal workers.

Reporters visited seven centers in Northern California, the San Joaquin Valley and on the Central Coast. They surveyed 150 families about living in housing and moving every year. Here are their findings.

Thousands of children living in the centers must bear the brunt of the annual moves. Most bounce from one school to another every few months and receive instruction in two different languages. Read more about these students here.

California farmworkers struggle to find housing — yet the state lets thousands of affordable units sit empty for three to six months every year. Read more about their housing here.

Support from readers like you helps us create quality, local journalism. Subscribe today to The Sacramento Bee: https://sacbee.com/subscribe

Wednesday, December 06, 2023

H2A Farm Workers Hung Out to dry

 wrapper

Pro-union H2A workers will be hung out to dry
if the DOL doesn’t immediately step in

Four years ago, in New York, workers won a law to help them organize. In the last year, workers organized and won union representation at five farms and have just filed at another farm. However, now due to a grower lawsuit, the NY Attorney General effectively froze the enforcement mechanism of farm worker law and left vulnerable H-2A workers who've spoken out unprotected and victimized. The US Department of Labor (DOL) can step in and change this, as they have jurisdiction over the guest worker visa program. 

Sign the petition today and ask the DOL, how they are going to protect these workers?

Background: Basically, NY growers decided they didn't like bargaining fairly for a union contract. After they lost their arguments to the state agency, they judge-shopped and took the same arguments to a federal district court where they filed a lawsuit asking to overturn the law. The New York Attorney General's office then made a decision to put everything on hold until the lawsuit is heard, without even asking the UFW how that would affect the workers.

The repercussions are being felt. Worker leaders had thought they were protected when they spoke out for the union. Now the growers know who they are and are retaliating. At one of the companies, Cahoon Farms, as employees boarded the bus for the trip back to Jamaica, around half of the H-2A workers were told they wouldn't be recalled in 2024 -- including a large number of union supporters. Unsurprisingly, this included four out of the five union committee members.

The reason was they supposedly didn't reach the production quota. However, according to more than a dozen workers, it was impossible to reach the quota, as there were not enough apples of the correct size to pick. "Jack" shared, "For most of the 2023 harvest season, our crew was assigned to spot pick in fields that did not have sufficiently sized apples to meet the minimum productivity requirement … We were sent to these fields numerous times, which I believe was intentional so that we would be set up to fail."

Sign the petition today. Ask the DOL to immediately step in and remedy this situation. Growers are retaliating against workers for protected union activity. Without the DOL's intervention, these H-2A workers will be hung out to dry. 

PS: After you take action you can also share this campaign on Facebook & Twitter

Duane Thank you for receiving our emails -- we appreciate everything you do!

Want to support our work? Start a monthly donation or chip in a one-time donation.

Visit our self-service portal to change your address or other information.

 To unsubscribe: unsubscribe

United Farm Workers (UFW)
PO Box62
Keene, CA 93531
United States •http://www.ufw.org • Privacy Policy

Thursday, November 23, 2023

Build a Longer Table

                                                        


 First, I wish you a happy Thanksgiving. It’s an opportunity for us to give thanks as well as to celebrate Indigenous peoples. And to extol our common good — the ideals that bind us together, rather than the xenophobia, racism, and misogyny that pull us apart. 

The Thanksgiving holiday is also an opportunity to become reenergized for the historic fight we face in coming months, when the anti-democracy forces of neofascism and bigotry seek to take over America. 

Please try to avoid two large traps that some people are already falling into: 

Denial. Some don’t want to accept that these anti-democracy forces are significant and growing, that Donald Trump has a realistic chance of being reelected president notwithstanding his attempted coup and upcoming criminal trials, and that if he succeeds, everything we believe in will be seriously threatened. 

But unless we see this for what it is, we cannot possibly summon the energy and determination necessary to stop Trumpist neofascism. 

Cynicism. Others are not in denial about the stakes ahead, but they are cynical that anything can be done to stop Trump and Trumpism from succeeding. They have basically given up on America. 

But cynicism is a self-fulfilling prophesy. If we give up, the anti-democracy movement wins. And if we lose our democracy, there is nothing we are able to do — reverse climate change or combat widening inequality or overcome institutional racism or avoid nuclear war or reduce any of the other existential threats we face. 

So let us use this day of gratitude to recommit ourselves to fighting for our ideals — for democracy, inclusion, tolerance, decency, and social justice — and refuse to be trapped by denial or cynicism. 

My best wishes to you and yours. 

Robert Reich, 

Thursday, November 16, 2023

LULAC Condemns Trump and Republican Plan

 


LULAC SLAMS DONALD TRUMP'S RACIST AND EXTREME ANTI-IMMIGRANT PLANS AS INHUMANE AND UNCHRISTIAN 

Nation's Oldest and Largest Latino Civil Rights Organization Demands Total Rejection by Faith-Based Groups and Self-Described American Patriots

 

"LULAC rejects in the strongest possible language the detestable and sick plans Trump is using in his fear-mongering quest for the White House," says Domingo Garcia, LULAC national president. "His vitriolic hate-filled speeches only inflame the deepest, most deranged hatred against immigrant Latinos and people of color. LULAC calls upon every American who believes we are a nation of immigrants and diversity to turn away from Trump's race-baiting tribal politics as dangerous. We have seen in history what happened when race-baiting, anti-Semitic, immigrant scapegoating are left unchallenged by good men and women."

The 2024 election holds ominous implications for the Latino community as Trump seeks to reimplement policies from his first term, including the so-called Muslim ban and the utilization of Title 42 to reject asylum seekers. Trump intends to deport millions of immigrants, many of whom have been here for over twenty years. He says he will detain them in large concentration camps while awaiting expulsion. This image is a stark reminder of the inhumane policies that marked his previous tenure and now make up his core promise for the future.

LULAC opposes any campaigning that attacks the Latino community. "We challenge candidates to stand on issues and stop the dog whistles that play to the worst stereotypes of millions of hard-working, law-abiding men, women, and children," adds Garcia. "The alarming rhetoric from the Republican field, advocating bombing Mexico and using deadly force against migrants, is a dangerous shift away from rational discourse and humane solutions."

LULAC supports securing the border, reforming our immigration system to allow more legal immigration, and going after cartels and human traffickers. LULAC will be organizing large-scale Latino voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives in swing states to deliver un voto de castigo or punishment vote against the politics of hate and racism.

LULAC calls upon faith-based groups and self-described American patriots to reject Trump's inhumane and un-Christian plans. The organization urges Americans to embrace a discourse centered on issues rather than divisive tactics perpetuating harmful stereotypes. As the nation's oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization, LULAC remains steadfast in its commitment to defending the rights and dignity of all, irrespective of their background or immigration status.

 

 About LULAC

The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is the nation’s largest and oldest civil rights volunteer-based organization that empowers Hispanic Americans and builds strong Latino communities. Headquartered in Washington, DC, with 1,000 councils around the United States and Puerto Rico, LULAC’s programs, services and advocacy address the most important issues for Latinos, meeting critical needs of today and the future. For more information, visit www.LULAC.org.

Tuesday, November 14, 2023

Choosing Democracy: Thousands Protest APEC Summit

Choosing Democracy: Thousands Protest APEC Summit:   SAN FRANCISCO, CA -12NOVEMBER23 - Thousands of demonstrators protested the San Francisco meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation ...

Monday, November 13, 2023

How We Live: Farmworkers

 


Investigation; Prison Services for Immigrants


Our friends at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are investigating the California prison system’s treatment of people who were born in other countries or who the prison system believes were born in other countries. Specifically, the ACLU is investigating the way the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation places potential immigration/ICE holds on people and then denies programming based on a potential or active ICE hold.

If you, a family member, or a friend have ever had a potential ICE hold and need assistance or wish to share your story about this please reach out to them using the information below to request a confidential legal call. They will attempt to set up a call with everyone who reaches out to them, but their ability to do so will depend on the number of people who reach out.

 

Maricela Sánchez

ACLU of Northern California

39 Drumm Street

San Francisco, CA 94111

(559) 214-0164


Saturday, October 07, 2023

Immigrants' Rights to Join a Union

 page1image888507968

IMMIGRANT EMPLOYEE RIGHTS UNDER THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT

page1image888579008

Although employers must obey immigration laws, if you choose to talk to or take action with your co-workers to improve your working conditions, it is illegal for your employer to use your immigration status against you.

For example:

  • Employers cannot threaten to call ICE because you and your co-workers tried to join a union.

  • Employers cannot demand that you produce new immigration papers because you talked with your co-workers or a union about your working conditions.


Regardless of immigration status, you have the same rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) as all covered employees including the right to:

  • Organize with a union to negotiate with your employer concerning your wages, hours, benefits, and other working conditions.

  • Talk about working conditions with your co-workers, the public, or a union.

  • Take action with your co-workers to try to improve your working conditions.

  • Choose not to do any of these actions.


If you believe that your employer has retaliated against you, your coworkers or your union, you can contact the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to file a charge. The NLRB will investigate the charge, which includes:

  • Taking your affidavit and asking for your evidence. Because you are protected under the NLRA just the same as any other worker and because an individual’s immigration status is not relevant to whether the NLRA has been violated, the NLRB will not ask about your immigration status or the immigration status of others during our investigation or litigation to prove violations of the NLRA.

  • The NLRB may take legal action against your employer if the evidence shows that your employer is unlawfully using your immigration status to threaten or retaliate against you because you exercised your rights under the NLRA. The NLRB may also work with other agencies to ensure that immigration laws are not being used to threaten or retaliate against workers for exercising their rights under the NLRA.

  • If your employer has fired you because you exercised your rights under the NLRA, the NLRB will work to get your job back and to get you paid for your lost wages. But if the employer proves that you were not authorized to work, the NLRB cannot order the employer to pay you lost wages and may not be able to get you your job back. In those situations, the NLRB will seek other remedies and may work with immigration agencies to assist with employees who have been victims of labor rights violations. For example, the NLRB may consider whether you could be eligible for a U or T visa or deferred action and may work with immigration agencies to try and obtain this kind of relief.

page1image888891024

Contact the NLRB: www.nlrb.gov, 1-866-667-NLRB, or download our mobile app!

page1image888900256 page1image888900560

Friday, October 06, 2023

Elections and Democracy in Guatemala

 

In Guatemala,  Indigenous and campesino groups have declared an indefinite national strike in response to judicial harassment of president-elect Bernardo Arévalo and his party Movimiento Semilla. Thousands of demonstrators have blocked traffic on major thoroughfares across the country. Indigenous and community leaders say the protests will continue until Attorney General Consuelo Porras and prosecutor Rafael Curruchiche resign and the Constitutional Court puts an end to what Arévalo has termed  “a slow-motion coup”  to prevent him from taking office in January. 
  
The strike entered its  fifth consecutive day today, with at least 28 active blockade points nationally. At the road blocks, Indigenous authorities, including the 48 Cantones de Totonicapán and Indigenous mayors' offices, are joined by university students and faculty, health workers, teachers, and a  wide range of civil society groups 
The strike comes after Guatemala’s Supreme Electoral Tribunal (TSE) was raided for a fourth time last week by officials from the Attorney General’s office. A  live stream video of the raid shows  distressing scenes of police wrestling vote tally boxes from the arms of justices who plead with officers to respect the will of voters. The 20-hour raid was part of ongoing investigations into spurious claims of election fraud targeting Arévalo and his Semilla party. International observers have said there is no evidence of vote tampering.  
  
For the people who voted for Arévalo, an anti-establishment candidate who promises to challenge entrenched corruption and impunity, the raids are an attempt on the part of political elites to weaken or disqualify their president-elect. 
  
Attorney General Porras and special prosecutor Curruchiche, seen as the key operatives in the campaign to sabotage Arévalo and Semilla, have both been  sanctioned by the U.S. government for anti-democratic actions and obstructing investigations into corruption in Guatemala. Since Arévalo’s surprise showing in the first-round presidential election in June, Porras and Curruchiche, together with judge Fredy Orellana, have repeatedly pursued fraud allegations and other supposed irregularities. The criminalization of Semilla follows a worsening trend of lawfare, institutional intimidation, and judicialization of dissent in Guatemala, as NACLA contributor  Vaclav Masek observed i n the lead-up to the August 20 runoff that handed Arévalo a landmark victory.  
  
Arévalo met with senior officials in Washington this week, after the U.S. State Department released a statement saying it was “ gravely concerned ” about ongoing efforts to undermine a peaceful transition of power. The U.S. government has imposed visa restrictions on current and former members of congress, justice officials, and “anyone else who undermines democracy.” In a statement, the White House expressed support for Arévalo “following last week's undemocratic efforts to undermine the will of the Guatemalan people, intimidate election authorities, and prevent the peaceful transition of power." 
  
In the face of the ongoing judicial harassment against Arévalo and Semilla, the TSE is considering  extending the formal election period until the January presidential inauguration, a move that would protect the party from suspension.  
  
The Organization of American States (OAS) described the situation in Guatemala as "a political persecution similar to those carried out in authoritarian regimes." The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has raised concerns about the risk of violence as political tension runs high.
 
 
 

In solidarity,
NACLA staff 

 
 

Dolores Huerta Foundation

  

Sign Dolores's Card!


In 2005, the Dolores Huerta Foundation launched its first house meeting campaign – a foundational piece of DHF's community organizing model – and organized its first grassroots volunteer groups to work on infrastructure improvements in Kern County, California. From this effort, Vecinos Unidos was born!

In its very first year, DHF's Vecinos Unidos network successfully advocated for the Bakersfield Board of Supervisors to improve public safety by building sidewalks around three area schools that lacked them.

Within the following year, the Vecinos led a successful campaign to remove the Texas company that had been hurting the community with its mismanagement of the local water board and bring in local management. Under its new leadership – which included three Vecinos who independently ran for and got elected to the water board – the board stabilized water rates, installed water meters in residents' homes for correct water usage monitoring, exposed gross mismanagement of funds by the previous board, and called a grand jury to investigate.

Even in its earliest years, DHF's community-based model of training and organizing local volunteer leaders showed the tremendous impact that improved the daily lives of community members. It's a model – invented by legendary community organizer Fred Ross, Sr. and pioneered by our founder and namesake Dolores Huerta – that has been expanded, refined, and replicated over the past two decades, leading to the growing list of successes, the empowerment of communities, and life-changing benefits for tens of thousands of families and individuals.

Vecinos Unidos, specifically, continues to empower community leaders through hands-on training to lead civic engagement campaigns, hold elected officials accountable, and secure positive outcomes to address the needs of their community. Vecinos chapters have successfully advocated for community improvements such as more parks, paved roads, pools, sewer connections, education equity, and more.

Thanks to the ongoing dedication of our volunteers, network members, and supporters like you, we'll keep making a difference in people's lives, protecting fundamental rights, and helping marginalized and vulnerable communities find their voice in our democracy for decades to come!

Stay tuned for more stories of impact as we celebrate 20 years of the Dolores Huerta Foundation, and if you're on social media and not already doing so, follow DHF's social media channels for even more updates on our work and ways to engage:

Facebook >>

X (Twitter) >>

Instagram >>

Thank you for everything you do!

– Your friends at the Dolores Huerta Foundation