Showing posts with label deportations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label deportations. Show all posts

Sunday, August 31, 2025

Which Side Are You On ?

  Which Side Are You On ?

The Border is Invading America.  August 29,2025.  NY Times. Opinion.  Jean Guerrero. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/08/29/opinion/immigration-border-politics.html?unlocked_article

 Press title. Americs's Border Politics Are Coming for Your Rights. 

This piece is a misinformed application of a series of bankrupt, unrealistic political  arguments. 

Each of what is said is relatively accurate.  But, what is not said, is far more important. Yes, the Democrats did not do enough on immigration during the last  two decade. But, the fascist currently in power not only are worse, their movement is organized to destroy U.S. democracy, not only to oppose more immigration.  Yes, the author notes the terror, but that terror is connected to a political project of taking over the nation.  It is not only terror against immigrants. 

So, take each of the points argued and listed as Democratic Party weakness. But, what is not said. Well, Obama tried to pass the Dream Act, when it failed he created the Dreamers where 640,000 achieved some legality. The Democrats failed to pass real immigration reform- in part because of the arguments like those in the piece.

Biden, on day 1, tried to pass comprehensive immigration reform. It would have covered about 13 million.  It failed. Others tried to pass the Farm Modernization Act, it would have covered 3 million plus.  It failed.  Biden dismantled the many horrendous practices of Trump 2016-2020;

Who has been admitted.- and not considered in the essay ?  By my count is 4,700,000 in H-1 B, H-2A, refugees, Temporary Protected Status, refugees, and more. I am not arguing each of these programs were good.  When claiming there is little difference between the Democrats and the MAGA Crowd, you do need to count. 

I am uncertain if the author’s purpose is the support the MAGA claim that the actions of the Democrats on immigration are not significantly different that the current  militarized terrorism in the streets. This is a dangerous false argument supporting the destruction of our democratic constitutional order.

Or is there some other purpose ? I don’t know.  

But, this is a perspective being promoted on line particularly in right wing circles. The argument is neither right nor left.  It is nihilist and based  ignoring substantial history of change in immigration policies during the last two decades and upon totally unrealistic political perspectives and how change is made in the U.S.  The argument has contributed to the 40 year failure to adopt realistic political reform. 

Dr. Duane Campbell.  40 years engaged in the struggle for immigrants’ rights.

Author, Choosing Democracy – a practical guide to multicultural education.  1996- 2010.  Allyn and Bacon. 

 

 

Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Los Angeles Resisting Trump's Deportations

 

Los Angeles is leading the way in resisting Trump’s mass deportations

Since Trump’s inauguration, Latinos and their allies in LA have organized walkouts and near daily protests against ICE and in support of the undocumented community.

On Jan. 20, during President Donald Trump’s inauguration, more than 2,000 people and 20-plus grassroots organizations gathered in Los Angeles to protest the administration’s immigration policies and promises of mass deportations. Waving flags of Latin American countries, chanting “Si Se Puede” and holding signs that denounce ICE and Trump, hundreds marched from Mariachi Plaza in Boyle Heights, California, to the federal Metropolitan Detention Center downtown where many detained by ICE are held. They joined over 60 community organizations such as Black Lives Matter LA and the Palestinian Youth Movement in protest.

Since Inauguration Day, those in Los Angeles, particularly East L.A. and Boyle Heights, have held several rallies and protests nearly every day against ICE and in support of the undocumented community.

“People want an end to the deportations,” said Gabriel Quiroz Jr., an organizer with Centro CSO who helped organize the Inauguration Day protest. “They’re seeing ICE in their neighborhoods. They’re hearing reports about ICE activity. There’s a lot of fear. But then there are a lot of people that are gonna stand up and fight back against this. They’re not gonna take this quietly.”

Quiroz said that while Central CSO and other community organizations in Boyle Heights and East LA have been leading activism efforts, there have also been a lot of spontaneous protests of people in the community showing up to gather and wave flags downtown. Quiroz has led and attended multiple protests since Trump’s inauguration, including student-led walkouts. As a community organizer, Quiroz has helped guide the youth protesting. He provided them with a megaphone and a banner that said “Lucha Contra Trump.”

Following the inauguration, there have been several walkouts of high school students from their schools in protest of the Trump administration and ICE raids, particularly in East LA and Boyle Heights, which are areas that are over 90 percent Latino.

“People are out there for their parents, out there for their grandparents, or they’re out there for themselves,” Quiroz said. “Even if we’re documented ourselves, our parents probably aren’t, our grandparents probably aren’t, so we know that we are not removed from that struggle. It’s important for us to be out there.”

Carlos Montes, a member of the Centro CSO, who was also a participant in the East LA walkouts in 1968 — a student-led uprising over 50 years ago in which thousands of Latinos in the area walked out of their schools to demand equal treatment — also helped organize the inauguration protest, attended several others and guided the students in their walkouts. 

Montes said he is “thrilled and exhilarated that the young generation has taken the initiative to come out and say no to deportations and the Trump attacks. I think it’s awesome that the students are continuing the traditional tactic of the walkouts that we popularized in ‘68.” 

Leilani Mercardo’s daughter, a sophomore at Garfield High School in East LA, participated in the student walkouts against ICE. Once Mercado heard about the walkouts, she joined her daughter and the two protested in Downtown Los Angeles together.

“I was actually very happy and proud of her,” Mercado said. “It brings me peace to know that she’s aware of her surroundings. She’s not going to abide by ignorance and ignore what’s going on around her, so it was kind of a bittersweet moment, definitely an opportunity for us to bond.”

Mercado said she has been to three of the protests, one on the inauguration and two that followed. She said it is important for her to participate because it helps her feel like she is being part of the change by being outside and outspoken. 

Having grown up in East LA and raising a daughter there, Mercado feels strongly for her community. She said that the protests are bittersweet because “it’s unfortunate that the rights of undocumented people and our families are being violated, but at the same time, I felt like we were doing something about it together.”

“It’s very close and dear to my heart,” Mercado said. “I come from a family of immigrants. I think that almost everybody in this community does. We’re all affected on some level, and ultimately this is against the human rights that our people deserve.”

Mercado said that she saw a lot of signs during these protests, but one that resonated with her the most was one that said “Don’t bite the hands that feed you.” She said her grandfather, uncle and cousins were farm workers, so that sign meant a lot to her. Another sign she said was memorable to her was one that read “Education, not deportation” because she has many close friends that are on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which allows children brought to the U.S. to go to school and work without threat of deportation.

She said that immigrants and undocumented people are often misrepresented and dehumanized in the media, and she hopes the protests will change the perception of the false narratives that are against them.

“They’re good people,” Mercado said. “They’re good humans, and aside from them having a significant contribution in the community and family values and respect for the land, they also do contribute financially with their work, their labor and good morals.”

Quiroz said that the protests were filled with youth, families and community members in Los Angeles, many waving flags from Latin American countries and dancing to traditional Mexican songs like “La Chona,” and supporting street vendors selling candies and ice cream.

“You got young kids, everybody dancing to music, waving flags, using the ‘Si Se Puede’ chants, ‘Pueblo Unido’ chants,” Quiroz said. “It’s pretty cool, because these are chants their parents … and their grandparents were probably using decades ago. It is beautiful — that Latino resistance.”

At protests organized by Centro CSO, they have had community members, advocates and elected officials speak out about why it is important to fight Trump and support the undocumented community. They also had a “know your rights” workshop built into a play put on for the community, which ended in ICE agents being defeated because the community knew their rights.

Quiroz said that he has noticed an increase in police and ICE presence in the community since Trump’s inauguration. He said that he has heard reports of unmarked cars passing by residential areas and markets. Even at the protests, Quiroz said they faced a lot of police repression. At one of the protests, police showed up in riot gear, broke up the crowds with their batons and fired projectile weapons. Some people were detained at the protests, though no one was charged. As someone who is experienced with protests, Quiroz was able to help manage.

“In that situation, I think that having been organizing and being activists for a couple years now, our leadership is very needed,” Quiroz said. “So I think it was great for us to be there in that situation, because we kept people from getting arrested, getting themselves hurt, because you can’t be protesting here if you’re in jail and you’re hurt.”

Quiroz said that grassroots organizations will continue to take the lead and work alongside the community to push the protests forward. He said the protests are building on Los Angeles’ rich history of Chicano activism, which includes the East LA Walkouts for equal education and the March 2006 student walkouts in support of immigrant rights.


In mid-February, over 60 community organizations in Los Angeles formed the Community Self-Defense Coalition, which is committed to patrolling neighborhoods and spotting ICE. Quiroz said that they have been informed on how to spot ICE, verify reports of ICE activity and inform the community of their activity. He said they are also careful not to spread fear, but to spread knowledge. 

Mercado said that there have been people creating platforms for others who want to participate and want to help. She said many in the community are also continuing to promote events and donating their time, money or supplies in support of the protests to ensure a safe environment.

“If people don’t actually step foot on the ground, go outside, hold a sign and get the attention of bystanders or the media, nothing gets done,” Mercado said. “Attention is attracted by holding signs and being vocal about what it is we want, and it encourages other people to do the same. Then they come to realize that we’re all affected by this. It just unifies everyone.”


Monday, November 25, 2024

Refuse, Resist

 






“As President I will immediately end the migrant invasion of America. We will stop all migrant flights, end all illegal entries, terminate the Kamala phone app for smuggling illegals (CBP One App), revoke deportation immunity, suspend refugee resettlement, and return Kamala’s illegal migrants to their home countries (also known as remigration). I will save our cities and towns in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and all across America.”

President-Elect Donald Trump can’t be faulted for not telling us what’s on his mind. And on this matter, he doesn’t flinch at numbers of 20 million or so to be expelled from our borders, undocumented or otherwise. This means temporary legal status for refugees, like Haitians ‘eating our pets,’ will be abolished. He not only tells us this racist nonsense, he does so repeatedly, drawing the greatest ‘red meat’ fascist chants during his rallies, even those held in locations with hardly any recent immigrants of any sort or status. Trump offers his crowds a rung on a hierarchical socio-economic ladder where they always have ‘the Other’ to view as beneath them.

But what Trump doesn’t reveal is the core irrationalism of his immigration program. Set aside the 20 million overall goal for a moment. To deport just 1 million over one year would cost the taxpayers nearly $90 billion, or about $90,000 for each deportee.

Why is the cost so high? We’re not even including the moral cost, which is immeasurable. After all, no change is needed to U.S. law to start deportations. Being in the U.S. without proper immigration status is a civil violation, with a fine starting at $25. Six months in jail is an option, and penalties are doubled for repeat offenders. Some are surprised at the small scale. Many traffic offenses draw harsher terms. But what matters is the ‘criminal’ label. That’s what turns a civil offender into ‘the Other.’ And deportation is considered the core legal civil penalty for it. 

For mass deportations, two things are required. The most important is instilling fear. Why so? Because it motivates self-deportation, the cheapest option. We can see it at work today in the increase of Haitians fleeing the city of Springfield, Ohio at the sight of armed Nazi militias near their homes. Fear leading to self-deportation was a major factor in Mexicans and Mexican-Americans fleeing to Mexico in large numbers during the ‘Wetback’ raids of the 1930s and 1950s. It was seen as better to cross the border without a police record than as the result of one. The former held the promise of an easier return when the fear subsided. 

The Israelis are also good at using fear. Self-deportation is one reason why we have Palestinian communities in many U.S. cities, although with less hope of return within them. But truth be told, the Israelis had much to learn from us. Our entire history is rooted in mass removals through fear. The Trail of Tears, where Andy Jackson, turned over Cherokee land to European-American settlers ,is only the most remembered.

But what is the second factor? Arrests are far from removal. Mass deportations require money, large quantities of it. And the money is not thrown into the winds. It’s massively transferred from the taxpayers into the coffers of those who profit from deportations. Arresting people is one thing, and the cost is relatively minor. But detaining them, judging them, and then exporting them by the planeloads is where the costs, and the profits, can soar.

Our Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, or ICE, can’t do this work alone. In 2024, Congress only allowed them the funds for 41,500 ‘detention beds,’ less than 5% of what might be needed. At the same time, as of September 2024, some 3.7 million immigrants, arrested and now awaiting resolution of their cases, were obviously not jailed, but ’at large.’ They were living with friends or relatives, and working ‘off the books’ along with tens of millions of others neither arrested nor detained but ‘living in the shadows.’ It’s why we hear the refrain that ‘our immigration system is broken.’ Indeed, it's capable of many decent reforms, but not on Trump's watch.

As of the end of September, 2024, 3.7 million people in the county were waiting for their claims for asylum, resident status or work permits to be resolved. And even if they were judged negatively and sentenced to deportation, many still could not be deported because their designated countries of origin had not agreed to accept deportation flights from the United States, or at least they likely would not accept anything like the numbers Trump hopes to dump on them.

The truth is Trump has no practical plan for mass deportation. We might say, as he said about health care reform, that he has ‘a concept of a plan.’ And that concept can be reduced to another irrationalism, ‘use the military.’ Here, Trump wants to rely on Sections 25- through 255 in Title 10 of the United States Code, aka ‘The Insurrection Act.’ It dates back to 1798, but was most recently used when U.S. troops were sent to Los Angeles to suppress the revolts around the Rodney King crisis. It’s the exception in U.S. law that allows for setting aside the standing Posse Comitatus Act forbidding the use of U.S. troops to enforce the law within the U.S. It’s been used every two or three decades throughout our history, most notably in recent times by FDR to imprison Japanese Americans and by JFK to enforce school desegregation in the South.

Trump’s projected use of the military, however, would be larger by several orders of magnitude. Rather than several hundred to 20,000 engaged in violence or a projected threat of it, Trump is aiming at tens of millions living and working peaceably in large cities or rural farms. Imagine what would happen in the Pilsen area of Chicago, 93% Mexican, or East Los Angeles, 95% Latino, if platoons of 30 or so federal troops, accompanied by a handful of ICE agents, began breaking down doors in search of those without papers. Let’s just say that passive acceptance is the least likely outcome. And even if it was, where are all of those seized to be detained? Tent cities put up by FEMA and surrounded with barbed wire? People still have agency and allies, and wire cutters can be obtained in any hardware store.

Trump is deluded with several irrational assumptions. First is thinking that only he and his troops have a vote on this matter. They do not. We all have a say, whether he gets it or not. Second is the assumption that his troops will obey unjust orders, especially over long periods, and in platoons where ‘whites’ may be a minority. Third is that a divided Congress will not cut off the funds for his stupidities.

Our old comrade Tom Hayden, RIP, once remarked: ‘Wars end when three things happen. The streets become ungovernable. The soldiers refuse to fight. And Congress cuts off the money.’ Here we will add a corollary: the three points apply even more so when the wars are being waged against tens of millions of people within our borders.

Trump’s dream of restoring a ‘White Republic’ is really a bloody nightmare for the rest of us. Thus it falls upon us to do everything required to make sure it never happens, or it’s stopped early in its tracks. How do we do it? First, we start where we are, at the local and state levels, asserting a progressive version of ‘states rights.’ (See Van Gosse’s article below). We begin by gathering the information and contacts required for systematic non-cooperation. 

We can talk to our local police and sheriffs about refusing to assist ICE and other federal efforts, starting with not using our local jails for detentions. Many of them may not agree at first, but some will. If nothing else, they will recognize the stupidity of Trump’s delusions and the cost of it. Then we organize legal aid teams for those subject to arrest. We oppose any secret courts or closed hearings. We talk to every local, county and state elected official. If we can’t convince them to ignore Trump’s demands on them, we can convince them they will be removed from office or their office will be made ‘ungovernable.’

Finally, in addition to the justice of it all—most of us do not want to be the ‘Good Germans’ in this movie—we need to expose and educate all concerned around its true cost economically. ‘A Day without Immigrants’ is a good instructive example. Ask people, in going about their usual day's activities, how many times do they come into contact with immigrant workers, including those likely without papers? Who gets the veggies in our markets? Who works in our restaurants? Who cares for our elders? Who works on tough construction sites and landscaping? Who cares for children in day care centers? Trump captures your attention with delusions about ‘the economy,’ but what happens as he tears out much of its heart and wrecks it? Don’t let this Chump take an inch without a fight. And get to work on it now.

[All LeftLinks editorials, unless otherwise designated, express the views of our stalwart editor, Carl Davidson, and not necessarily any organizations he is connected with. Everyone, of course, is welcome to steal them and shamelessly pass them around, far and wide, with or without permission. A thank you note would be welcome, though!]

sub: https://carldavidson.substack.com/ 

Saturday, September 28, 2024

Latino Civil Rights vs.Project 2025

 The Battle Ahead: Latino Civil Rights vs. Project 2025

Prepared by Adriana Varea, Ari Kittrie, and Joaquin Macias, LULAC Policy and Legislation Fellows




Introduction


The 2025 Mandate for Leadership, The Conservative Promise, more publicly recognized as “Project 2025” is a roadmap for the first 180 days in office for a conservative presidency. It was drafted by The Heritage Foundation, which is a right-leaning, conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. charged with crafting policies that align with the Republican party. The Heritage Foundation gave the first Mandate for Leadership to Reagan to “repair the executive branch” after Jimmy Carter’s presidency.

Former President Trump has recently distanced himself from Project 2025 by tweeting:

“I know nothing about Project 2025. I have no idea who is behind it. I disagree with some of the things they’re saying and some of the things they’re saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal. Anything they do, I wish them luck, but I have nothing to do with them.” (@realDonaldTrump)

However, this was refuted by a 2022 statement from former President Trump:

“[The Heritage Foundation] is a great group, and they’re going to lay the groundwork and detail plans for exactly what our movement will do and what your movement will do when the American people give us a colossal mandate to save America.” (Bennen, 2024)

Additionally, several authors, editors, and contributors of Project 2025 have previously worked for the Trump administration. Roughly 64% of policy recommendations from the 2016 Mandate for Leadership were either implemented or taken into consideration by the Trump Administration in 2017 (The Heritage Foundation).

In this article, we will outline ten specific ways in which Project 2025 disproportionately negatively impacts Latino civil rights.

1. Establish a Unitary Executive Branch


2. Mass Deportations


“Prioritizing border security and immigration enforcement, including detention and deportation, is critical if we are to regain control of the border.” (Project 2025, pg. 135)

Project 2025 plans to repeal parts of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008 to allow for the large-scale use of detention facilities to mass incarcerate migrants. It also will change Title 8 of U.S. Code § 1226 to require mandatory detention for unauthorized migrants caught within the U.S. interior (pg. 150). To compound this, Project 2025 will also increase Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) capabilities by removing all sensitive zones where ICE personnel are prohibited from operating, allowing for raids in schools, churches, and businesses (pg. 142).

Project 2025 calls to authorize state and local law enforcement to participate in immigration and border security actions (pg. 150). Through deputizing local law enforcement, there will be a lack of oversight and accountability, allowing for abuses of the system that would disproportionately hurt the Latino community. Additionally, Latinos would have a more difficult time receiving impartial hearings and legal representation, especially because detainees are not entitled to public defenders as criminal defendants are. To compound upon this, the Supreme Court Case Loper Bright Entreprises vs. Raimondo, which repealed the Chevron Deference, has the potential to take immigration hearings away from the United States Immigration and Citizenship Services and shift them to the local courts. These local courts notoriously have long backlogs and a limited understanding of immigration policies and laws, which would force Latinos to have long and unjust trials.

3. Cutting Off Legal Immigration


“Victimization should not be a basis for an immigration benefit.” (pg. 144) “If CISOMB continues as a DHS component, a policy should be issued that prohibits CISOMB from assisting illegal aliens to obtain benefits. Currently, approximately 15 percent–20 percent of CISOMB’s workload consists of helping DACA applicants obtain and renew benefits, including work authorization. This is not the role of an ombudsman.” (Project 2025, pg. 166)

Project 2025 proposes to cut down on legal immigration by limiting interim immigration into the United States. For example, it calls for an increase in visa application fees. It plans to limit the issuance of H-2A and H2-B visas for seasonal agricultural workers, as well as the complete elimination of T and U visas meant to protect trafficking or crime victims who are actively cooperating with law enforcement as a witness (pg. 612, 141). Project 2025 calls to remove and deport all Temporary Status designations for migrants whose home countries are considered unsafe to live in (pg. 145). Finally, Project 2025 will phase out DACA for the over 500,000 recipients by eliminating staff time for reviewing and processing renewal applications which will make it very hard for DACA recipients to renew their status given the proposed lack of staff present to do so (pg.145).

 

And More 

 

Project 2025 

https://lulac.org/project_2025/

 

and on our Electoral Fight Back site. 

 

 Our building a united front is here;
 North Star: Defeat MAGA/Fight for Democracy Action Opportunities
List of opportunities:  
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cRIJsSJwtF72ckJ8QLQu5cDCGnoeh5OIIjwqRkDKdBg/edit?usp=sharing



Sunday, September 22, 2024

Integration: Not Deportation. the Cost to California

 Guest column: The real question is integration of undocumented immigrants, not deportation

Jamshid Damooei   https://www.vcstar.com/story/opinion/2024/09/21/guest-column-the-real-question-is-integration-of-undocumented-immigrants/75282530007/

We should applaud the Biden Administration for taking a significant step toward helping long-term undocumented immigrants married to U.S. citizens and 50,000 undocumented stepchildren of citizens become permanent legal residents. This brings hope to many undocumented immigrants and their families.

However, many Californians — and Americans as a whole — are leery. They blame undocumented immigrants for all the economic and social problems they face, ranging from unemployment to low wages and a surge in crimes. What they might not know is how their lives and economic well-being are intertwined with the lives of undocumented immigrants. California is a shining example of this.

Every Californian shares the benefits of undocumented immigrants’ contributions and is responsible for their well-being. Unfortunately, there’s a common belief that undocumented immigrants have taken advantage of unsecured borders and do not belong in this country.

Reality cannot be further away from such a perception.

According to the Immigration Policy Institute, in 2019 there were more than 2.7 million undocumented immigrants in California. Of these immigrants, about 72% have lived here over 10 years. This begs the question: How long does it take to call a place home?

Some 28.3% of Latino residents of California live with people who are labeled “undocumented.” For Asian residents, it’s 12.8%. Nearly 14% of California residents are connected with the lives of undocumented immigrants in the state. According to the latest information from the California Immigration Data Portal of the Equity Research Center of the University of Southern California, in 2021, 28% of all Latino children under 18 years old lived with undocumented parents. The percentage for all children in California was 17. This makes clear that what we are doing to undocumented immigrants, we are doing to our children and the future of our state and the nation.

Undocumented immigrants’ contribution to the labor force and working population is remarkable, yet seldom discussed in policy debates. In 2021, 41% of all agriculture workers were undocumented; this only formed 14.5% of all working undocumented immigrants in California. It defies the common perception that all undocumented immigrants are either in agriculture or household services.

Focusing on Los Angeles County, which has approximately a quarter of the state’s population, 28.7% of construction workers were undocumented immigrants, 17.5% manufacturing, 16% whole trade and 15.4% retail trade.

Imagine California’s economy, the fifth largest in the world, if all the undocumented immigrants were deported. Think about the significant proportion of our children whose parents and relatives were deported. This impact would cripple California.

People who are against immigration may not realize that their work and economic well-being heavily depend on the work of undocumented immigrants.

This segment of our population generates around $152 billion in value added within the state economy, or 4.9% of the state’s gross domestic product (GDP). according to a February 2024 study by the Center for Economics of Social Issues (CESI) at California Lutheran University. Adding the indirect impact (supply chain business-to-business value added) and induced (value added stemming from household spending of labor income) the total value added reaches $298.5 billion or 9.6% of total GDP in 2019.

Think about that.

Through the work of undocumented immigrants, 1.25 million additional jobs were created within the state. This same study shows that California’s undocumented immigrants, paid, in total, some $22 billion toward various tax channels. Setting aside the contribution by employers toward Social Security, approximately $17.5 billion is paid by the undocumented immigrants themselves. Let us not forget that employers’ contributions are based on the employees’ work.

Of this amount, about $9.3 billion has been paid as Social Security by them and their employers — which they will never see a dime of because of their immigration status. In addition to Social Security, undocumented immigrants pay many of the same taxes but are not eligible for many benefits — including refundable tax credits, Pell grants, student loans and nutrition programs. This is happening across the United States, where they are, in essence, financially supporting the nation’s citizens.

Unfortunately, many Americans overlook these realities. A path to citizenship will increase productivity and wages — not just for those eligible for legalization, but for all workers — and create hundreds of thousands of jobs and increase tax revenue. This pathway would boost the U.S. GDP by a cumulative total of $1.7 trillion (with a T) over 10 years and create 438,800 new jobs, according to a 2021 study by the Center for American Progress, in collaboration with the University of California and Davis’s Global Migration Center.

Let us look forward to a day when undocumented immigrants have a clear path to becoming permanent legal residents, not only for their sake but also for the state’s and country’s economy.

 

Jamshid Damooei, Ph.D., is the executive director of the Center for Economics of Social Issues and director of the undergraduate economics program at California Lutheran University.

 

Thursday, August 15, 2024

California Forced Deportations

  

California must recognize historic forced deportations, lawmakers say. ‘Ripped families apart

 

 In California news: California Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday called for the state to commemorate the Mexican Repatriation of the 1930s, a 15-year period when nearly two million people of Mexican descent were deported to Mexico. Read the full story here.

Monday, July 22, 2024

Mass Deportations _

Left unity is more important than ever around this issue. Now is the time for US socialist organizations to come together to develop a strategy to fight against Trump’s plans and for full rights for all undocumented workers. All leftists and activists can organize within unions, independent political organizations, non-profits, and other mass organizations within which they are organizing.  


Mass Deportations

Trump is calling for mass deportation of the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States, the great majority of whom are Mexican, but who also include Central Americans, Cubans, Venezuelans, Haitians, Chinese, and Muslims. The New York Times on November 11th ran an article titled “Sweeping Raids, Giant Camps, and Mass Deportations: Inside Trump’s 2025 Immigration Plans.” The article provides a chilling description of the plan: “To help speed mass deportations, Mr. Trump is preparing an enormous expansion of a form of removal that does not require due process hearings.” He wants to build massive deportation camps to house the millions of immigrants and refugees they plan to remove from the US. Trump has publicly compared his plan to the infamous “Operation Wetback” of the Eisenhower administration, in which millions of Chicanos and Mexicanos, many of them US citizens, were rounded up and deported to Mexico. 

Most people don’t realize the horrendously broad impact of these policies, not only on those rounded up and shipped out, but on their families, their communities, on schools, local businesses, churches, and faith organizations, and unions with large numbers of immigrant worker members.

To help Immigration and Customs Enforcement carry out sweeping raids, Trump plans to reassign other federal agents and deputize local police officers and National Guard soldiers voluntarily contributed by Republican-run states. He would pay for this terror project by using money from the massive US military budget, as he did during his first administration when Congress refused to fund his infamous border wall.

An End to Legal Immigration

Unlike during his first administration, Trump’s plan assumes broad judicial support from the reactionary Supreme Court majority that he appointed as well as from the hundreds of federal judges that he appointed during his administration.

The racist neo-fascist agenda includes ending the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program altogether. It also includes ending the Temporary Protected Status Program that provides refuge for hundreds of thousands of people fleeing systemic violence or natural disasters.

The Trump and Republican agenda includes virtually eliminating opportunities for legal immigration and promising to end the Constitutionally protected policy of birthright citizenship for babies born in the US to undocumented parents, and ordering federal agencies to stop issuing Social Security cards and passports to these citizens. Trump has also promised to cancel the visas of international students who participated in anti-Israel or pro-Palestinian activities. US consular officials would have the okay to block visa applicants whom a Trump administration considers to have undesirable attitudes.

Trump’s racist agenda has not only received enthusiastic support from most of the Republican Party, but some of them have upped the ante by promising to launch military assaults, including missiles, against Mexican drug cartels.

This agenda is but one crucial example of the program of the New Confederacy, represented politically primarily by the Republicans. For leftists and progressives, this is but one more proof that this neo-fascist right-wing movement represents the greatest threat to any semblance of democracy, equity, and social justice. And these measures do not even include Trump’s plans to eliminate all federal policies that address the climate crisis and provide a complete green light (and federal subsidies) to the fossil fuel industrial complex.

So where is the outrage? Where are the marches? Where are the sit-ins? Where are the boycotts? Where are even the articles or blogs that should be sounding the alarm about this planned ethnic cleansing?

Michael Fleshman, “Not One More Deportation,” 2014 

What Is to Be Done?

Labor can take the lead in this important fight for equity and democracy. The AFL-CIO should work together with the extensive network of worker centers throughout the US to not only push back on Trump’s plans but work to achieve genuine immigration reform, including an accessible path to citizenship for all the undocumented, and full protection for all undocumented young people brought to the United States as children (“dreamers”).

Left unity is more important than ever around this issue. Now is the time for US socialist organizations to come together to develop a strategy to fight against Trump’s plans and for full rights for all undocumented workers. All leftists and activists can organize within unions, independent political organizations, non-profits, and other mass organizations within which they are organizing. Those fighting for the rights of oppressed gender people have an important role to play as well, especially since significant numbers of undocumented people impacted by a massive deportation campaign would be women (and children). 

Trump’s threat calls for a powerful and sustained response from the Democratic Party. The groups mentioned above can demand that response in an open letter calling for an immediate denunciation of the whole Trump program. This includes a commitment to genuine and comprehensive immigration reform that will provide immediate and unconditional residency to all refugees and asylum seekers while the authorities process their cases. We need to fight to restore the DACA program, and to advocate for new immigration legislation that will provide an accessible path to citizenship for all undocumented residents. This program should also include a promise to protect birthright citizenship. 

All of this work should be supported by a comprehensive communications campaign to get out the word—including the Spanish-language and other non-English media, Black media, and progressive outlets such as Democracy Now, Real News Network, the  Mexico Solidarity Media website, and op-ed features in the mainstream media as well. Now more than ever, we need to work to win the battle of ideas on this issue.


This article was written by Bill Gallegos as part of Liberation Road’s “Adalante!” booklet series, in coordination with the Mexico Solidarity Project. A former member of the Brown Berets and a founder of the New Raza Left, Bill Gallegos has been an activist and theorist in the Chican@ Liberation Movement since the 1960s. 


Tuesday, February 02, 2021

ICE CONTINUES Deportations !

 HOUSTON (AP) — President Joe Biden’s administration has deported hundreds of immigrants in its early days despite his campaign pledge to stop removing most people in the U.S. illegally at the beginning of his term.

A federal judge last week ordered the Biden administration not to enforce a 100-day moratorium on deportations, but the ruling did not require the government to schedule them. In recent days, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement has deported immigrants to at least three countries: 15 people to Jamaica on Thursday and 269 people to Guatemala and Honduras on Friday. More deportation flights were scheduled Monday.

It’s unclear how many of those people are considered national security or public safety threats or had recently crossed the border illegally, the priority under new guidance that the Department of Homeland Security issued to enforcement agencies and that took effect Monday.

Some of the people put on the flights may have been expelled —which is a quicker process than deportation— under a public health order that former President Donald Trump invoked during the coronavirus pandemic and that Biden has kept in place.

In the border city of El Paso, Texas, immigration authorities on Friday deported a womanwho witnessed the 2019 massacre at a Walmart that left 22 people dead. She had agreed to be a witness against the gunman and has met with the local district attorney’s office, according to her lawyers.

Rosa was pulled over Wednesday for a broken brake light, detained based on previous traffic warrants, then transferred to ICE, which deported her before she could reach her attorney, said Melissa Lopez, executive director of the nonprofit Diocesan Migrant & Refugee Services, which represents her.

Rosa is being identified only by her first name because she fears for her safety in Juárez, a city across the U.S.-Mexico border from El Paso that’s known for violence and gang activity.

Jail records confirm that Rosa was booked into the El Paso jail on Wednesday for the warrants and left Friday. ICE had issued what’s known as a “detainer,” seeking to hold her on immigration violations the day she was arrested, according to the El Paso County Sheriff’s Office.

The El Paso district attorney’s office confirmed in a statement Monday that it had given Rosa’s attorneys the documentation needed to request a U.S. visa for crime victims. But the statement also said Rosa “is not a victim of the Walmart shooting case.” The district attorney did not immediately respond to follow-up questions.

Her lawyers say Rosa pleaded guilty in 2018 to driving under the influence and ICE later released her, underscoring that authorities under Trump previously found she wasn’t a threat to the public, Lopez said.

Both Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris vocally opposed the Trump administration’s immigration priorities during the presidential campaign.

“It’s important that President Biden and Vice President Harris realize that despite their very clear desires about how immigrants are treated, we continue to see on a local level immigrants being mistreated and disregarded,” Lopez said.

ICE said Friday that it had deported people to Jamaica and that it was in compliance with last week’s court order. The agency did not respond to several requests for further comment on additional deportation flights or Rosa’s case.

Officials in Honduras confirmed that 131 people were on a deportation flight that landed Friday. Another flight that landed in Guatemala on Friday had 138 people, with an additional 30 people expected to arrive Monday, officials there said.

The White House referred questions to the Department of Homeland Security, but a spokesman did not return requests for comment.

Democratic U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar of Texas, whose district includes El Paso, said her office had flagged Rosa’s case to the White House.

“My concern is that ICE will continue to move quickly before the Biden administration has an opportunity to make assessments and provide further directives,” Escobar said Monday.

Two legal experts say that regardless of the judge’s order on the deportation moratorium, ICE could release immigrants with deportation orders, keep people detained or otherwise delay the deportation process.

“Scheduling deportations is still a matter of discretion for the agency,” said Steve Yale-Loehr, an immigration law professor at Cornell University.

U.S. District Judge Drew Tipton last week granted a temporary restraining order sought by Texas that bars enforcement of a 100-day deportation moratorium that had gone into effect January 22. Tipton said the Biden administration had violated the federal Administrative Procedure Act in issuing the moratorium and had not proven why a pause in deportations was necessary.

Tipton on Friday said he would extend his order through February 23. The Justice Department has not yet asked Tipton or a federal appeals court to block the order.

The White House on Friday reissued a statement saying it believed a moratorium was “wholly appropriate,” adding that “President Biden remains committed to taking immediate action to reform our immigration system to ensure it’s upholding American values while keeping our communities safe.”

Biden is expected to issue a series of immigration-related executive orders Tuesday amid the expected confirmation of Alejandro Mayorkas as Homeland Security secretary. Those orders are expected to include the formation of a task force to reunify families separated during the Trump administration.

***

Associated Press journalists Will Weissert in Washington, María Verza in Mexico City, and Sonia Pérez D. in Guatemala City contributed to this report.

What did the executive orders do?  Form commissions to study the situation.

Trump Official’s Last-Day Deal With ICE Union Ties Biden’s Hands

A whistle-blower accused Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II of an abuse of power in making sweeping concessions to pro-Trump Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/01/us/politics/cuccinelli-biden-ice.html


Wednesday, January 27, 2021

Moratorium on Deportations- And Court Order

   EFFECTS OF COURT ORDER BLOCKING DEPORTATION MORATORIUM

100-Day Moratorium on Deportations and Enforcement Priorities
On January 20, 2021, the DHS Acting Secretary issued a memo that:
(A) Ordered the agency (including ICE & CBP) to review all enforcement policies and consider what they should change;
(B) Ordered ICE to prioritize certain groups of people for removal proceedings, arrest, detention, and deportation. These categories go into effect on February 1 and may change after ICE issues more guidance. The categories include:
● People the government suspects of terrorism or espionage or considers to be a danger to national security;
● People who entered the US on or after November 1, 2020;
● People who were released from criminal custody in jail or prison on January 20,
2021 or later, and who have an “aggravated felony” conviction (a type of conviction according to immigration law that may include misdemeanor and nonviolent offenses), and who the government believes pose a threat to public safety; and
(C) Paused most deportations, except:
● People who entered the US on or after November 1, 2020;
● People the government suspects of terrorism or espionage or considers to be a
danger to national security;
● People who, after talking to a lawyer, voluntarily sign a form saying they agree to
be deported; and
● People the ICE Director determines must be deported by law.
Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) Temporarily Stopping the Moratorium on Deportations
On January 22, 2021, Texas sued the US government to stop the January 20 Memo from taking effect. On January 26, a judge in Texas issued a TRO against the moratorium.
A TRO is a temporary block on a government action so that the judge can consider the case before the government action happens. In this case, the judge said that the Biden Administration cannot pause deportations while the judge is considering Texas’s case.
Although the reasoning behind the TRO is wrong and deeply unjust, it unfortunately means that the moratorium on deportations is temporarily paused.
Here are the key things to know about what the TRO does and does not do:
 
● The TRO does not block the change in ICE’s priorities. ICE is still ordered to focus its enforcement on the more limited groups of people from the memo, starting February 1. People who do not fall into one of those groups may request prosecutorial discretion, which means that ICE may agree not to deport or take other actions against them.
● The TRO applies to the moratorium on deportations. ICE may now deport people who have a final order of removal. A final order of removal is when an immigration judge has ordered a person removed and that person either decided not to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, or lost their appeal.
● The TRO does not require the government to deport people. It just stops the government from automatically pausing all deportations. People who have final orders of removal can still apply for stays of removal (a request that ICE not deport someone even when they have a final order) or other forms of prosecutorial discretion. ICE should still consider the new enforcement priorities when deciding whether or not to grant stays and prosecutorial discretion. And other federal courts can still issue their own stays of removal in other cases (for example if a person has a petition for review at a Circuit Court).
● The TRO does not stop people who are detained from asking for release. For example, people who are especially at risk of severe illness or death from COVID may still ask for release from detention under Fraihat, and detained people may still ask for release under bond or orders of supervision.
The TRO is in effect for 14 days. The judge has ordered another round of briefing in the case, which means there is likely to be another hearing and a new decision sometime in the next week or two. We will continue to issue advisories as the situation develops.
Please note this information is intended as a resource for community members and does not constitute legal advice. If you have questions about this fact sheet, please contact Joseph Meyers at jmeyers@nipnlg.org or La Resistencia at resistenciasolidarity@gmail.com or at 800-357-3196.
           2

-- 

Tuesday, May 12, 2020

Trump is Using the Virus to Cover Up Major Deportations

Trump is using the Virus to cover up mass deportations.


https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/11/opinion/trump-coronavirus-immigration.html?

Sunday, April 05, 2020

Don't Be Stupid- Don't Deport DACA Health Care Wor...

Choosing Democracy: Don't Be Stupid- Don't Deport DACA Health Care Wor...: Opinion Don’t Deport DACA Health Care Workers  If the Supreme Court affirms the administration’s termination of DACA, thousands of v...

New data from the Center for American Progress reveals that the DACA-recipient health care work force includes more than 6,000 diagnosing and treating practitioners, including respiratory therapists, physicians assistants and nurses; some 8,000 health aides, including nursing assistants and orderlies; more than 7,000 other health care support workers; and some 5,500 health technologists and technicians.
The Association of American Medical Colleges told the Supreme Court that nearly 200 physicians, medical students and residents depend on DACA for their ability to practice medicine and serve their communities. Those 200 trainees and physicians alone would care for hundreds of thousands of patients per year in normal times — the association estimates as many as 4,600 patients per year, per person. Under the demands of the Covid-19 pandemic, those numbers will be much higher.
The Center for Migration Studies found that 43,500 DACA recipients work in the health care and social-assistance industries, including more than 10,000 in hospitals.
If the Supreme Court upholds the decision to terminate DACA, nearly 700,000 people — including those health care workers — will lose their ability to work and live in the United States. The administration is preparing to deport DACA recipients and has repeatedly stated that it will do so if the Supreme Court gives it the green light, something that could happen as soon this coming Monday, April 6. There are many reasons for the Supreme Court to hold the administration’s decision invalid, and the pandemic confirms those flaws.

Friday, January 24, 2020

Mexico National Guard Stops Honduran Caravan

FRONTERA HIDALGO, Mexico (AP) — Hundreds of Central American migrants were hauled onto buses by Mexican national guardsmen and immigration agents after crossing into the country early Thursday and walking for hours along a rural highway.
The migrants had stopped for the day at a shaded crossroads when hundreds of national guard troops advanced their lines to within 100 yards (meters) of the migrants. A brief negotiation stalled, the migrants knelt to the ground in prayer and began to chant “we want to pass.”
National guardsmen in riot gear advanced banging their plastic shields with batons and engaged the migrants. There was shoving and pepper spray as migrants were rounded up.
Many of the people allowed themselves to be escorted to the buses without resistance. Women cradling small children or holding kids’ hands wept as they walked toward the buses.
Others resisted and were subdued by guardsmen. One man dragged by four guardsmen shouted “they killed my brother, I don’t want to die,” presumably in reference to the possibility of being returned to his country.
A woman crying as she walked toward a bus said, “I have a great need for my children.”
A paramedic attended to an injured woman lying on the highway shoulder.The road was left littered with water bottles, plastic bags and clothing. An irate man in a blue shirt yelled at the agents “this is a war against the Hondurans,” gesturing angrily.
It was a sudden climax after the day had seemed to be winding down.
Carrying U.S. and Honduran flags at the head of the procession, the migrants had been walking on a highway toward hundreds of national guardsmen since crossing the Suchiate river from Guatemala at dawn.
Jose Luis Morales, a Salvadoran de facto spokesman for the caravan, said the migrants wanted to negotiate to be allowed to pass peacefully.