Saturday, May 03, 2025

Federal Judge Restricts Border Patrol in California

 A federal court on Tuesday issued a preliminary injunction forbidding the Border Patrol from conducting warrantless immigration stops throughout a wide swath of California. 

The ruling came in response to an American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit filed after the El Centro Border Patrol traveled to Kern County to conduct a three-day sweep in January, detaining day laborers, farm workers and others in a Home Depot parking lot, outside a convenience store and along a highway between orchards.  

The ruling prohibits Border Patrol agents from taking similar actions, restricting them from stopping people unless they have a reasonable suspicion that the person is in violation of U.S. immigration law. It also bars agents from carrying out warrantless arrests unless they have probable cause that the person is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained. 

“You just can’t walk up to people with brown skin and say, ‘Give me your papers,’” U.S. District Court Judge Jennifer L. Thurston said during a Monday hearing in Fresno that featured moments of heated exchange between government attorneys and the judge.

The ACLU filed suit on behalf of United Farm Workers, arguing that the stops violated the Fourth Amendment. The judge has not decided on the totality of the case, but on Tuesday granted the ACLU’s motion to stop the Border Patrol from conducting similar operations while the case moved through the courts. 

“I think that it’s pretty clear that half of a century of really established law is being upheld. It’s unfortunate that this is a cause for celebration. It’s not legal to snatch people off the street for looking like farm workers or day laborers,” said Elizabeth Strater, vice president of United Farm Workers. 

California Attorney General Rob Bonta agreed. “That’s existing law, and the judge’s order reflects existing law.” 

“You can’t just indiscriminately stop people and search them without any appropriate reasonable suspicion or probable cause or without a warrant,” Bonta said at a news conference in San Diego on Monday about conditions in ICE detention. “So, it sounds like the judge had seen enough and wanted to issue an order. “

The injunction is in effect in the jurisdiction of California’s Eastern District, which spans the Central Valley from Redding to Bakersfield. 

After the January sweep, the man who led it, Chief Patrol Agent Gregory Bovino, said his agents specifically targeted people with criminal and immigration histories. However, a CalMatters investigation revealed that the Border Patrol had no criminal or immigration history on 77 of the 78 people it arrested.


Tuesday, April 29, 2025

Trump; Sus padres fueron deportados, pero la niña de 2 años sigue en EE. UU.

 

Sus padres fueron deportados, pero la niña de 2 años sigue en EE. UU.

El gobierno de Trump envió a la madre a Venezuela y al padre a una prisión en El Salvador, mientras que la hija permanece en algún lugar de Estados Unidos.

Una mujer joven con un tatuaje en la garganta sostiene en brazos a un bebé que lleva un gorro de peluche rosa.
Yorely Bernal con su hija, AntonellaCredit...Raida Inciarte

Una familia venezolana pide que una niña de dos años sea devuelta a su madre luego de que el viernes las autoridades estadounidenses deportaran a la madre a Venezuela sin la niña.

El padre de la niña fue enviado a una prisión de El Salvador en marzo.


Thursday, April 24, 2025

LULAC Protects Voters" Rights

LULAC SECURES SWEEPING FEDERAL COURT VICTORY IN DEFENSE OF VOTERS' RIGHTS

Nation's Oldest and Largest Latino Civil Rights Organization Wins Injunction Halting Anti-Voter Executive Order That Threatened to Disenfranchise Millions

Washington, D.C. — The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) today hailed a landmark federal court ruling that strikes down key provisions of a controversial executive order seeking to impose documentary proof of citizenship for voter registration—an effort that posed a direct threat to millions of eligible voters across the country, especially in Latino, Black, Indigenous, student, and military communities.

U.S. District Court Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued a preliminary injunction preventing the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) from enforcing Section 2(a) of Executive Order 14248, which had instructed the EAC to alter the federal voter registration form to include new, burdensome documentation requirements. The Court also blocked Section 2(d), which would have permitted federal agencies to deny voters access to the federal registration form unless they could verify citizenship, effectively rolling back decades of hard-fought voting protections.

"This decision is a crucial win for voting rights and a direct strike against efforts to intimidate and disenfranchise Latino voters and communities of color," said Roman Palomares, LULAC National President and Chairman of the Board. "LULAC joined this legal challenge because the stakes were too high. This was a blatant attempt to override federal law, bypass Congress, and deter lawful voters from participating in our democracy. The Court rightly upheld the principle that voting is a right—not a privilege reserved for a select few."

The Court's decision affirms that the president does not possess unilateral authority to impose conditions on voter registration governed by the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), a statute enacted by Congress to streamline and expand voter participation. Under this law, the EAC—not the Executive Branch—has exclusive authority to determine the content of the federal voter registration form. Any attempt by the president to dictate changes outside of that process is unlawful and unconstitutional.

"This is not just a victory for LULAC, but for every eligible American voter," said Juan Proaño, LULAC Chief Executive Officer. "The Court sent a clear and powerful message: no president can unilaterally rewrite election law to suppress the vote. This ruling ensures our elections remain accessible, lawful, and free from undue interference. It safeguards the voices of millions who depend on the integrity of our democratic system."

Had the executive order been enforced, it would have placed an unlawful burden on marginalized voters, many of whom do not possess the narrow forms of identification that would have been required. The order also threatened to eliminate the use of mail-in ballots in 17 states, disenfranchising voters with disabilities, active-duty military personnel, and overseas citizens. Further, it would have imposed harsh penalties on states that refused to comply, including withholding essential federal funding.

"This executive order was an attempt—without any legal authority—to upend our voter registration and mail-in voting processes," added Palomares. "The impact would have been devastating, particularly for voters already facing barriers. This ruling restores confidence in our democratic system. It reminds us that our courts remain a vital defense against executive overreach."

LULAC served as lead plaintiff in the case, joined by its partners, the Secure Families Initiative and the Arizona Students' Association, with legal representation from the Campaign Legal Center and the State Democracy Defenders Fund. Plaintiffs included college students, Latino voters, and members of the military—all communities historically at higher risk of being disenfranchised.

"This ruling reaffirms the separation of powers and the checks and balances that protect our freedoms," said Proaño. "It is a reminder that no one—not even a former president—can stand above the Constitution. The rule of law prevailed."

LULAC has long been at the forefront of protecting the voting rights of underrepresented communities and will continue to lead the fight against voter suppression, intimidation, and any form of discrimination aimed at silencing the voice of the American people.

Donate

# # #

About LULAC
The League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) is the nation's oldest and largest Latino civil rights organization. Founded in 1929, LULAC is committed to advancing the rights and opportunities of Latino Americans through advocacy, community building, and education. With a growing network of councils nationwide, LULAC remains steadfast in its mission to protect and empower millions of Latinos, contributing daily to America's prosperity. For more information about LULAC and its initiatives, please visit www.LULAC.org.

 

Monday, April 14, 2025

Trump, Migrants and the Insurrection Act

 What is the Insurrection Act?

The Insurrection Act authorizes the president to deploy military forces inside the United States to suppress rebellion or domestic violence or to enforce the law in certain situations. The statute implements Congress’s authority under the Constitution to “provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.” It is the primary exception to the Posse Comitatus Act, under which federal military forces are generally barred from participating in civilian law enforcement activities.

 

The Insurrection Act, in principle, only allows the American president to use the armed forces to assist civilian authorities to enforce some law in the presence of an insurrection. But the language of the law is quite vague. Trump makes it clear that he has in mind invoking the Insurrection Act to very broad purposes, essentially to change the regime.

 


  1. What does it do? Invoking the Insurrection Act would allow Trump to deploy the military (including federalized National Guard) anywhere in the US. Trump may claim it’s to protect the border, but he could deploy these forces anywhere.
  2. Why April 20? On his first day in office, Trump directed the Department of Homeland Security to take 90 days to come up with a recommendation on whether he should invoke the Insurrection Act to solve the non-existent immigration crisis. 90 days after January 20 is April 20. It could come earlier, or it could never come.
  3. How bad could it get? We don’t know! Maybe Trump doesn’t invoke it at all -- he didn’t in his first term. Or maybe he does, and he further militarizes the border. Or maybe he uses it to implement his promised nationwide deportation force and crack down on peaceful protest. Last week, his ICE Director described their vision of creating a deportation system “like [Amazon] Prime, but with human beings.” Maybe that’s mere bluster, or maybe that’s the plan. Nobody knows -- which means we should neither freak out prematurely nor ignore the warning signs.

So what do we do about it? The courts are unlikely to save us here -- the Insurrection Act gives fairly wide authorities to the President and the courts have historically been fairly deferential regarding those powers. This is more of a political question than a legal question: Does Trump look strong and decisive, and does his support grow by virtue of invoking the Act? As he militarizes the border and beyond, do his approval numbers increase? Does his coalition hold strong? Or is there widespread backlash, defiance, opposition, and ridicule? In the latter case, Trump may call it off and claim that was his plan all along.


Tuesday, February 25, 2025

Los Angeles Resisting Trump's Deportations

 

Los Angeles is leading the way in resisting Trump’s mass deportations

Since Trump’s inauguration, Latinos and their allies in LA have organized walkouts and near daily protests against ICE and in support of the undocumented community.

On Jan. 20, during President Donald Trump’s inauguration, more than 2,000 people and 20-plus grassroots organizations gathered in Los Angeles to protest the administration’s immigration policies and promises of mass deportations. Waving flags of Latin American countries, chanting “Si Se Puede” and holding signs that denounce ICE and Trump, hundreds marched from Mariachi Plaza in Boyle Heights, California, to the federal Metropolitan Detention Center downtown where many detained by ICE are held. They joined over 60 community organizations such as Black Lives Matter LA and the Palestinian Youth Movement in protest.

Since Inauguration Day, those in Los Angeles, particularly East L.A. and Boyle Heights, have held several rallies and protests nearly every day against ICE and in support of the undocumented community.

“People want an end to the deportations,” said Gabriel Quiroz Jr., an organizer with Centro CSO who helped organize the Inauguration Day protest. “They’re seeing ICE in their neighborhoods. They’re hearing reports about ICE activity. There’s a lot of fear. But then there are a lot of people that are gonna stand up and fight back against this. They’re not gonna take this quietly.”

Quiroz said that while Central CSO and other community organizations in Boyle Heights and East LA have been leading activism efforts, there have also been a lot of spontaneous protests of people in the community showing up to gather and wave flags downtown. Quiroz has led and attended multiple protests since Trump’s inauguration, including student-led walkouts. As a community organizer, Quiroz has helped guide the youth protesting. He provided them with a megaphone and a banner that said “Lucha Contra Trump.”

Following the inauguration, there have been several walkouts of high school students from their schools in protest of the Trump administration and ICE raids, particularly in East LA and Boyle Heights, which are areas that are over 90 percent Latino.

“People are out there for their parents, out there for their grandparents, or they’re out there for themselves,” Quiroz said. “Even if we’re documented ourselves, our parents probably aren’t, our grandparents probably aren’t, so we know that we are not removed from that struggle. It’s important for us to be out there.”

Carlos Montes, a member of the Centro CSO, who was also a participant in the East LA walkouts in 1968 — a student-led uprising over 50 years ago in which thousands of Latinos in the area walked out of their schools to demand equal treatment — also helped organize the inauguration protest, attended several others and guided the students in their walkouts. 

Montes said he is “thrilled and exhilarated that the young generation has taken the initiative to come out and say no to deportations and the Trump attacks. I think it’s awesome that the students are continuing the traditional tactic of the walkouts that we popularized in ‘68.” 

Leilani Mercardo’s daughter, a sophomore at Garfield High School in East LA, participated in the student walkouts against ICE. Once Mercado heard about the walkouts, she joined her daughter and the two protested in Downtown Los Angeles together.

“I was actually very happy and proud of her,” Mercado said. “It brings me peace to know that she’s aware of her surroundings. She’s not going to abide by ignorance and ignore what’s going on around her, so it was kind of a bittersweet moment, definitely an opportunity for us to bond.”

Mercado said she has been to three of the protests, one on the inauguration and two that followed. She said it is important for her to participate because it helps her feel like she is being part of the change by being outside and outspoken. 

Having grown up in East LA and raising a daughter there, Mercado feels strongly for her community. She said that the protests are bittersweet because “it’s unfortunate that the rights of undocumented people and our families are being violated, but at the same time, I felt like we were doing something about it together.”

“It’s very close and dear to my heart,” Mercado said. “I come from a family of immigrants. I think that almost everybody in this community does. We’re all affected on some level, and ultimately this is against the human rights that our people deserve.”

Mercado said that she saw a lot of signs during these protests, but one that resonated with her the most was one that said “Don’t bite the hands that feed you.” She said her grandfather, uncle and cousins were farm workers, so that sign meant a lot to her. Another sign she said was memorable to her was one that read “Education, not deportation” because she has many close friends that are on Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, which allows children brought to the U.S. to go to school and work without threat of deportation.

She said that immigrants and undocumented people are often misrepresented and dehumanized in the media, and she hopes the protests will change the perception of the false narratives that are against them.

“They’re good people,” Mercado said. “They’re good humans, and aside from them having a significant contribution in the community and family values and respect for the land, they also do contribute financially with their work, their labor and good morals.”

Quiroz said that the protests were filled with youth, families and community members in Los Angeles, many waving flags from Latin American countries and dancing to traditional Mexican songs like “La Chona,” and supporting street vendors selling candies and ice cream.

“You got young kids, everybody dancing to music, waving flags, using the ‘Si Se Puede’ chants, ‘Pueblo Unido’ chants,” Quiroz said. “It’s pretty cool, because these are chants their parents … and their grandparents were probably using decades ago. It is beautiful — that Latino resistance.”

At protests organized by Centro CSO, they have had community members, advocates and elected officials speak out about why it is important to fight Trump and support the undocumented community. They also had a “know your rights” workshop built into a play put on for the community, which ended in ICE agents being defeated because the community knew their rights.

Quiroz said that he has noticed an increase in police and ICE presence in the community since Trump’s inauguration. He said that he has heard reports of unmarked cars passing by residential areas and markets. Even at the protests, Quiroz said they faced a lot of police repression. At one of the protests, police showed up in riot gear, broke up the crowds with their batons and fired projectile weapons. Some people were detained at the protests, though no one was charged. As someone who is experienced with protests, Quiroz was able to help manage.

“In that situation, I think that having been organizing and being activists for a couple years now, our leadership is very needed,” Quiroz said. “So I think it was great for us to be there in that situation, because we kept people from getting arrested, getting themselves hurt, because you can’t be protesting here if you’re in jail and you’re hurt.”

Quiroz said that grassroots organizations will continue to take the lead and work alongside the community to push the protests forward. He said the protests are building on Los Angeles’ rich history of Chicano activism, which includes the East LA Walkouts for equal education and the March 2006 student walkouts in support of immigrant rights.


In mid-February, over 60 community organizations in Los Angeles formed the Community Self-Defense Coalition, which is committed to patrolling neighborhoods and spotting ICE. Quiroz said that they have been informed on how to spot ICE, verify reports of ICE activity and inform the community of their activity. He said they are also careful not to spread fear, but to spread knowledge. 

Mercado said that there have been people creating platforms for others who want to participate and want to help. She said many in the community are also continuing to promote events and donating their time, money or supplies in support of the protests to ensure a safe environment.

“If people don’t actually step foot on the ground, go outside, hold a sign and get the attention of bystanders or the media, nothing gets done,” Mercado said. “Attention is attracted by holding signs and being vocal about what it is we want, and it encourages other people to do the same. Then they come to realize that we’re all affected by this. It just unifies everyone.”