The primary beneficiaries of the Obama administration's move are families in which some
members are US citizens and some aren't.
At present some family members must return to their home country for up
to 10 years while they apply for U.S. residency as a 1996 law – approved by a
Republican-led Congress – mandates.
The proposed change will undergo a review but doesn't
require congressional approval. Under the so-called "hardship
waiver," illegal immigrants who are married or otherwise related to
US citizens would be able to pick up the waiver before leaving the United States and
then be allowed to return almost immediately after picking up visas in their
home countries. This policy used to be known as advanced parole.
According to an article in the New York Times, for Sat.
Jan. 7, by Julia Preston the union representing ICE
agents is resisting this policy change.
It has not allowed its members to participate in training to implement
the new rule. Chris Crane,
the president of the American Federation of Government Employees claims that
new rule amounts to violating the law.
( This was the law prior to 1996) Crane, of AFGE, is working closely
with Lamar Smith, the Texas Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee and a
Republican leader on opposition to immigration reform.
In examining individual cases that may not be representative
I note that the current practice with ICE is that residents from
White ( European) countries are commonly allowed to adjust their status while
remaining in the U.S. Residents from non White countries, particularly
Latin American and Asian, are required to return to their home countries and
apply for immigration- a process that can take up to a decade. The reason for
the difference ? Persons from mostly European countries ( and Australia),
do not have a significant backlog of applications for immigration thus,
their cases can be resolved in a matter of months- not so for Mexican,
Philippinos, Chinese and similar groups.
SEIU Vice President Eliseo Medina praised the new rules on
Friday. Here is the SEIU statement
on the issue.
SEIU applauds today's announcement by the Obama Administration to
knock down bureaucratic obstacles for U.S. citizens who currently face hardship
because their spouses cannot remain in the country legally.
The decision makes a small but significant change. It will allow
spouses and a small number of adult children to apply for a hardship waiver
from inside the U.S. instead of facing the risk of returning to their home
countries to apply and being denied reentry into the U.S. for as long as 10
years. The risks, uncertainties and delays that come with applying for the visa
from abroad create unnecessary burdens on families in hardship cases.
To qualify for the waiver, the U.S. citizen must show that she would
suffer "extreme hardship" if forced to remain separated from a spouse
or parent. Typical examples include U.S. citizens who are sick or disabled and
are being cared for or supported by their immigrant spouse or parent.
The policy change to let immigrants in hardship cases remain in the
U.S. while their applications for hardship wavers are reviewed was welcomed by
SEIU's International Secretary-Treasurer Eliseo Medina in the following
statement:
"Outdated laws and procedures should not keep families apart. The
new process will lessen the burden on U.S. citizens, whose family members are
afraid or unable to leave the country specifically because of the hardships
they face. For example, a wife who is taking care of her citizen husband, a
permanently disabled war veteran, will not have to choose between providing for
her husband or leaving the country to apply for a green card, which carries the
risk of being denied reentry for up to 10 years.
"This streamlined procedure also makes budgeting sense. Instead
of having U.S. State Department officers posted overseas to shuttle applications
back to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security here in Washington, the
process and the costs will be cut.
"The Obama Administration is applying smart governing principles
to a very simple problem and deserves credit for moving ahead in the absence of
comprehensive immigration legislation from Congress. While just one small
bureaucratic change will make a difference in the lives of families facing
hardships, comprehensive reforms could vastly improve our economic, national
and family security.
No comments:
Post a Comment