Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil.
by Duane Campbell. Prof. Emeritus. Bilingual/Multicultural Education. CSU-S.
In 2015 after the Great Recession a new state budgets sent
large amounts of funds to k-12 schools and the funds of the Local Control
and Accountability Plan were targeted to low income schools. This increased funding will lead to a
dramatic need for new teachers. Sacramento
City Unified plans to hire 100 new teachers, and many other local urban districts
will do the same. This faculty growth
will continue for from 3-5 years.
But credentialed teachers from the Latino community and
several Asian communities will not be available to hire because the Sac State
pipeline for minority teachers has been
broken. A new generation of mostly Anglo
teachers will be hired which will continue the past failure to integrate the
teaching profession in this region. Ending the pipeline will shape the nature
of the local teaching profession for decades. Latino students make up 37 % of Sac City Unified students, Asians 17.4 %, African Americans 17.7 %, and White students 18.8 %. Latino families now make up over 37 % of California residents and Latino
descent children now make up over 50% of public school students.
The Bilingual Multicultural
Education Department at Sac State was set up as a structure so that the university,
CSU-Sacramento, could serve the community
by preparing and advancing hundreds of Chicano and Asian teachers each year.
Unfortunately, others shut down this vehicle. Between 1994 -2006, Latino
descent students were about 35% of the total teacher preparation students each
year ( 60 -90 students per semester). After the termination of the
department in 2010, Latino descent students were less than 10% of the
total students in teacher preparation at Sac State (about 7 students). This decline
was a direct consequence of eliminating the department.
Update: Data just made available in Feb. 2016 shows that the percentage of Latinos in teacher credentialing at CSU-Sacramento has increased to about 16% of the total credential students. Hmong make up less than 2 %. This is an improvement of 2012-2014, but only reaches the level of students we had in 1976, before the establishment of a department dedicated to Bilingual and Multicultural Education. Sac State had a successful program, but neo liberal ideology and indifference to the needs to the Latino community ended the program. See the Mexican American Digital History recording here. https://sites.google.com/site/chicanodigital/home/the-creation-and-demise-of-bilingual-education-at-csu-sacramento-2
Update: Data just made available in Feb. 2016 shows that the percentage of Latinos in teacher credentialing at CSU-Sacramento has increased to about 16% of the total credential students. Hmong make up less than 2 %. This is an improvement of 2012-2014, but only reaches the level of students we had in 1976, before the establishment of a department dedicated to Bilingual and Multicultural Education. Sac State had a successful program, but neo liberal ideology and indifference to the needs to the Latino community ended the program. See the Mexican American Digital History recording here. https://sites.google.com/site/chicanodigital/home/the-creation-and-demise-of-bilingual-education-at-csu-sacramento-2
The Pipeline
The Bilingual Multicultural Education
Department program at Sac State, like the earlier Mexican American
Education Project, was a product of the Chicano movement, the influence
of the United Farm Workers, and the social justice movement in public
education. A goal was to penetrate the institutions ( universities) to
create an alternative democratic social justice educational vehicle as a
strategy for social change.
A significant organizing vehicle at Sac State was a small changing core
group of faculty focused on a series of common goals. Specific
organizational and change strategies changed over time.
A major strategy for change was to create a program with majority
status for Chicano/Mexicano students and students of color. The
experience of being in the majority ( majority status) changed the lives of
many, focused the students and faculty on empowerment, and introduced,
renewed and continued the positive aspects of the Chicano/social justice
movements to students from later generations who were born, reared, and
educated after the movement decline. The program kept the dream of
educational justice alive for over two decades.
Over the decades of the 1980’s and 90’s, fewer and fewer faculty had
themselves participated in the social movements. As a consequence
the commitment to educational efforts based upon social
movements, empowerment, and participatory democracy declined. By
2006 the political culture of the College of Education regressed to its mean-
away from multicultural education goals and toward an increase in the normal,
traditional, College of Education culture of faculty seeking individual advancement.
In each generation of students after the 1980’s we had fewer and fewer
students who had participated in movements, particularly the Chicano Civil
Rights movement. However until 2006 the BMED center was a place where the
few students who had experienced movements and had been educated by
movements were re-enforced, encouraged, and where they became opinion
leaders.
Our programs presented multicultural and
bilingual teacher preparation as a vocation ,as a change agent as much as
a career. When the student population of conscious students declined,
they were less influential. A similar pattern occurred among faculty as
the generations changed.
The increased ambivalence toward the need for substantive school reform and
teacher preparation reform to achieve multicultural goals and social justice
goals along with the changing experiences of faculty and students led to a
rupture of the prior faculty unity of purpose to create and extend a
multicultural teacher preparation program. The BMED
department was terminated by a vote of the entire College faculty in 2010.
The great majority of the students did not even know the matter was
under consideration. This illustrates how far the engagement and empowerment of
students had declined.
In the BMED department we set up a structure so that the
university, CSU-Sacramento, could continue to serve the community by preparing
and advancing hundreds of Chicano and Asian teachers each year.
Unfortunately, others shut down this vehicle. Between 1994 -2006, Latino
descent students were about 35% of the total teacher preparation students each
year ( 60 -90 students per semester). After the termination of the
department in 2010, according to reports of students and faculty, Latino descent students were less than 10% of the
total students in teacher preparation. This decline was a direct
consequence of eliminating the department. You will not recruit significant numbers of Latino students if there is no program for them.
Programs such as BMED and Chicano Studies are
ultimately based upon people- both faculty and students. As long as the faculty
were dedicated to building a pipeline to open the teaching profession to
Latinos and other people of color the program was successful.
After a decade a number of faculty lost this
interest. Instead they pursued their individual
career goals and projects and the collective responsibility to protect the
program was lost.
In this environment a decline in FTE caused by
the Great Recession and endless personal conflicts led to the “re-organization”
of the College of Education including the elimination of the
Bilingual/Multicultural Education Department. The individual faculty
members kept their positions, but the program was dissolved and the educational
pipeline broken.
Individual faculty in the department of
Teacher Education who had long criticized the BMED program as separatist joined
with a segment of the BMED faculty in voting to eliminate the program.
Like prior reforms including bilingual
education (repealed by Prop. 227) and affirmative action hiring (repealed by
Prop.209) once a program has become successful the forces of repression find a
way to stop the program and to return the power to the (mostly Anglo) power
structure. This is accomplished by faculty who consider themselves
enlightened, liberal, and progressive.
There is little doubt that individual faculty
and students will continue to create positive projects and efforts at CSU-Sacramento.
But, an organized, collective effort is always stronger than individual
efforts and this organized, collective effort has been terminated.
For a longer, detailed description of these
events. See https://sites.google.com/site/chicanodigital/home/the-creation-and-demise-of-bilingual-education-at-csu-sacramento-2
No comments:
Post a Comment